Abstract:ObjectiveTo develop and externally validate the STRAtifying Treatments In the multi-morbid Frail elderlY (STRATIFY)-Falls clinical prediction model to identify the risk of hospital admission or death from a fall in patients with an indication for antihypertensive treatment.DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingPrimary care data from electronic health records contained within the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD).ParticipantsPatients aged 40 years or older with at least one blood pressure measurement between 130 mm Hg and 179 mm Hg.Main outcome measureFirst serious fall, defined as hospital admission or death with a primary diagnosis of a fall within 10 years of the index date (12 months after cohort entry). Model development was conducted using a Fine-Gray approach in data from CPRD GOLD, accounting for the competing risk of death from other causes, with subsequent recalibration at one, five, and 10 years using pseudo values. External validation was conducted using data from CPRD Aurum, with performance assessed through calibration curves and the observed to expected ratio, C statistic, and D statistic, pooled across general practices, and clinical utility using decision curve analysis at thresholds around 10%.ResultsAnalysis included 1 772 600 patients (experiencing 62 691 serious falls) from CPRD GOLD used in model development, and 3 805 366 (experiencing 206 956 serious falls) from CPRD Aurum in the external validation. The final model consisted of 24 predictors, including age, sex, ethnicity, alcohol consumption, living in an area of high social deprivation, a history of falls, multiple sclerosis, and prescriptions of antihypertensives, antidepressants, hypnotics, and anxiolytics. Upon external validation, the recalibrated model showed good discrimination, with pooled C statistics of 0.833 (95% confidence interval 0.831 to 0.835) and 0.843 (0.841 to 0.844) at five and 10 years, respectively. Original model calibration was poor on visual inspection and although this was improved with recalibration, under-prediction of risk remained (observed to expected ratio at 10 years 1.839, 95% confidence interval 1.811 to 1.865). Nevertheless, decision curve analysis suggests potential clinical utility, with net benefit larger than other strategies.ConclusionsThis prediction model uses commonly recorded clinical characteristics and distinguishes well between patients at high and low risk of falls in the next 1-10 years. Although miscalibration was evident on external validation, the model still had potential clinical utility around risk thresholds of 10% and so could be useful in routine clinical practice to help identify those at high risk of falls who might benefit from closer monitoring or early intervention to prevent future falls. Further studies are needed to explore the appropriate thresholds that maximise the model's clinical utility and cost effectiveness.

External validation of a model using health administrative data to predict acetabular fracture probability: Brief report

Applying models of care for total hip and knee arthroplasty: External validation of a published predictive model to identify extended stay risk prior to lower-limb arthroplasty

External validation of predictive models for new vertebral fractures following percutaneous vertebroplasty

External validation of FRISBEE 5-year fracture prediction models: a registry-based cohort study

Development and Internal Validation of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Mortality After Hip Fracture with Machine Learning Techniques

Risk of atrial fibrillation and association with other diseases: protocol of the derivation and international external validation of a prediction model using nationwide population-based electronic health records

Development and Validation of Multivariable Prediction Models for In-Hospital Death, 30-Day Death, and Change in Residence After Hip Fracture Surgery and the “Stratify-Hip” Algorithm

Predicting fractures in an international cohort using risk factor algorithms without BMD

A Computed Tomography–Based Fracture Prediction Model With Images of Vertebral Bones and Muscles by Employing Deep Learning: Development and Validation Study

DXA-based statistical models of shape and intensity outperform aBMD hip fracture prediction: A retrospective study

Analysis of High-Risk Factors and Construction of a Nomogram Predictive Model for Deep Venous Thrombosis in Pelvic and Acetabular Fracture Patients Treated Conservatively

A novel clinical prediction model for hip fractures: a development and validation study in the total population of Sweden

External Validation of a Predictive Score for Fracture-Related Infections in Orthopedic Trauma Surgery

External validation of the computer aided risk scoring system in predicting in-hospital mortality following emergency medical admissions

An electronic health record (EHR)-based risk calculator can predict fractures comparably to FRAX: a proof-of-concept study

Association of distal radial fracture with comorbidities: model development and validation

Prediction model for tibial plateau fracture combined with meniscus injury

Development and external validation of a risk prediction model for falls in patients with an indication for antihypertensive treatment: retrospective cohort study

Volumetric Markers of Body Composition May Improve Personalized Prediction of Major Arterial Bleeding after Pelvic Fracture: A Secondary Analysis of the Baltimore CT Prediction Model Cohort.

Deep Learning With Electronic Health Records for Short-Term Fracture Risk Identification: Crystal Bone Algorithm Development and Validation

Osteoporotic hip fracture prediction from risk factors available in administrative claims data – A machine learning approach