Abstract:Existing literatures predominantly emphasize the unidirectional impact of banking competition on regional carbon emissions, often overlooking its concurrent emissions-increasing and emissions-reducing effects. Utilizing panel data from Chinese cities at the prefectural level and above from 2011 to 2020, this study delves into both the emissions-enhancing and emissions-mitigating impacts of banking competition, assessing their net effect through a bilateral random frontier model. As indicated by the results: (1) the emissions-increasing effect of banking competition reaches 0.2614, the emissions-reducing effect is 0.1580, and the net effect refers to an increase of 0.1034 in carbon emissions. The result of the mechanism analysis suggests that banking competition is capable of reducing carbon emissions by facilitating technological progress and upgrading industrial structures, whereas it can result in exacerbated carbon emissions by increasing the number of fixed asset investments and the scale of resident consumption. (2) By incorporating the threshold model into the bilateral random frontier model, the results reveal that with the increase of the degree of banking competition, the marginal effect of banking competition's emissions-reducing effect on regional carbon emissions increases, whereas the marginal effect of its emissions-increasing effect declines. (3) As indicated by the results of the spatial econometric analysis, while banking competition increases local carbon emissions, it also increases carbon emissions in adjacent areas. This study can lay a solid foundation for improving the theory and empirical evidence of banking competition and regional carbon emissions while providing experience and evidence for China and other developing countries to achieve carbon emissions reduction.

When green finance meets banking competition: Evidence from hard-to-abate enterprises of China

Bank competition and firm greenwashing: Evidence from China

Banking competition and the effectiveness of environmental regulations: Evidence from China

Does bank competition curb corporate pollution emissions? Evidence from the geographical location of bank branches

How does green credit affect the financial performance of commercial banks? ——Evidence from China

Does green innovation mitigate financing constraints? Evidence from China’s private enterprises

Green finance policy and enterprise green development: Evidence from China

Bank green lending and credit risk: an empirical analysis of China's Green Credit Policy

Banking competition and regional carbon emissions: Intensifying or suppressing? – Estimation based on a bilateral random frontier model

Fostering firm productivity through green finance: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

Integrated development of green finance and green accounting in policy banks

Bank-Firm Relationship and Corporate Green Innovation: Evidence from China

Does the implementation of green finance regulation promote the high-quality development of enterprises? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China

The Impact of Green Credit on the Profitability of Commercial Banks in a Low-Carbon Context

Green finance and corporate environmental responsibility: evidence from heavily polluting listed enterprises in China

Empirical research on the impact of green credit development on the profitability of commercial banks

Does green finance enable firms to promote environmental performance: Evidence from random forest methods?

Does Green Finance Drive Environmental Innovation in China?

Green finance and the mitigation of corporate debt financing in China: evidence and implications for sustainable finance

Go green: How does Green Credit Policy promote corporate green transformation in China

An Empirical Study on the Impact of Green Credit on Financial Performance of China’s Listed Banks