Abstract:Autism, Ahead of Print. The Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) system has been used increasingly in research to record and evaluate the everyday speech of autistic children and their families. However, it is unclear how researchers are using LENA and whether the system is well-suited for work with autistic individuals. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the use of LENA in autism research, to highlight the strengths and limitations of the system as identified by researchers, and to provide recommendations for future research and clinical use. Forty-two studies that used LENA with samples of autistic children were identified through a systematic database search. Researchers using LENA in autism did so across a variety of ages, settings, and analytical approaches. Most studies used LENA within recommended guidelines. The most common purpose of using LENA was for exploratory research. Noted strengths of the LENA system included ecological validity, cost-effectiveness, and timely clinical feedback. Limitations included lower rates of speaker identification compared to human coders and limited information regarding speech context and language development. This systematic review provides key insights into the methods surrounding LENA use in autism research and serves to inform researchers and clinicians on best practices for future use with this technology.Lay abstractIn research, language ability has historically been measured using structured tasks in laboratory settings. In recent years, there has been a growing emphasis on the need to instead capture language ability in an individual's natural setting (i.e. through social interaction or in their home). Considering natural language may be particularly important for the autistic population, as an autistic child's language ability can be very different depending on the setting. One common tool for capturing natural language is the LENA recording system, which takes audio recordings over long periods of time and provides estimates of children's and caregivers' speech. The purpose of this systematic review is to summarize the use of LENA in autism research, to highlight the strengths and limitations of the system as identified by researchers, and to provide recommendations for future research and clinical use. We identified 42 autism studies that used LENA in a variety of ways and settings. Most studies used LENA within the guidelines put forth by its creators, and it was most commonly used to understand speech or speech development for autistic children. LENA is a useful tool for clinicians and caregivers to gain some insights into child speech, but those considering using it should be aware of concerns about its accuracy and limitations about the information it provides. In this review, we supplement the official LENA guidelines with specific suggestions for use with the autistic population.

Consistency and reliability of automated language measures across expressive language samples in autism

Bias in measurement of autism symptoms by spoken language level and non-verbal mental age in minimally verbal children with neurodevelopmental disorders

Predicting Language in Children with ASD Using Spontaneous Language Samples and Standardized Measures

Eliciting Language Samples for Analysis (ELSA): A New Protocol for Assessing Expressive Language and Communication in Autism

The Utility of Natural Language Samples for Assessing Communication and Language in Infants Referred with Early Signs of Autism

Identifying Childhood Expressive Language Features That Best Predict Adult Language and Communication Outcome in Individuals With Autism Spectrum Disorder

Objective measurement of vocalizations in the assessment of autism spectrum disorder symptoms in preschool age children

Remote Natural Language Sampling of Parents and Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder: Role of Activity and Language Level

Normal but Different: Autistic Adolescents Who Score Within Normal Ranges on Standardized Language Tests Produce Frequent Linguistic Irregularities in Spontaneous Discourse

Automatic speaker diarization for natural conversation analysis in autism clinical trials

Reliably quantifying the severity of social symptoms in children with autism using ASDSpeech

Using the LENA® system for children with autism in educational settings: A comparison with human coders

Language ENvironment Analysis (LENA) in Phelan-McDermid Syndrome: Validity and Suggestions for Use in Minimally Verbal Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Analysis of a Repetitive Language Coding System: Comparisons between Fragile X Syndrome, Autism, and Down Syndrome

TITLE : An MEG Investigation of Neural Biomarkers and Language in Nonverbal Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders

The use of Language ENvironment Analysis in autism research: A systematic review

An Automated Assessment Framework for Atypical Prosody and Stereotyped Idiosyncratic Phrases Related to Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Objective Measurement of Social Communication Behaviors in Children with Suspected ASD During the ADOS-2

Real‐time coded measures in natural language samples capture change over time in minimally verbal autistic children

Speech and language patterns in autism: Towards natural language processing as a research and clinical tool

Evaluation of mismatch negativity as a marker for language impairment in autism spectrum disorder