Differential Role of mGluR5 in Cognitive Processes in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Major Depression
Irina Esterlis,Sarah DeBonee,Ryan Cool,Sophie Holmes,Stephen R. Baldassari,Paul Maruff,Robert H. Pietrzak,Margaret T. Davis
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/24705470221105804
2022-01-01
Chronic Stress
Abstract:Background A robust literature supports the role of the metabotropic glutamate receptor type 5 (mGluR5) in cognitive functioning. mGluR5 is also implicated in the pathophysiology of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and major depressive disorder (MDD), which are characterized by cognitive alterations. However, the relationship between mGluR5 and cognition in MDD and PTSD has not yet been directly investigated. To address this gap, we examined the relationship between in vivo mGluR5 availability and cognition in PTSD, MDD, and matched healthy adults (HA). Methods Individuals with PTSD ( N = 28) and MDD ( N = 21), and HA ( N = 28) were matched for age, gender, and smoking status. Participants completed 18 F-FPEB positron emission tomography (PET) scan, psychiatric and cognitive assessments. Results Across models examining the relationship between mGluR5 availability and different domains of cognition across diagnostic groups, only the interaction of diagnosis*attention was significant ( F 4,64 = 3.011, P = .024). Higher mGluR5 availability was associated with poorer attention in PTSD in 4 frontolimbic regions of interests (ROI's: OFC ( r = −.441, P = .016), vmPFC ( r = −.408, P = .028), dlPFC ( r = −.421, P = .023), hippocampus ( r = −.422, P = .025). By contrast, mGluR5 availability in the MDD group was positively related to Attention (ATTN) in the OFC ( r = .590, P = .006), vmPFC ( r = .653, P = .002), and dlPFC ( r = .620, P = .004). Findings in the hippocampus for MDD followed the same pattern but did not survive correction for multiple comparisons ( r = .480, P = .036). ATTN and mGluR5 availability were not significantly related in the HA group. Of note, in MANOVA analyses group*ATTN interaction results in the OFC did not survive multiple comparisons ( P = .046). All other findings survived correction for multiple comparisons and remained significant when covarying for potential confounds (eg, depressed mood). Conclusions We observed a significant relationship between frontolimbic mGluR5 availability and performance on tests of attention in individuals with MDD and PTSD. This finding aligns with animal work showing dysregulation in mGluR5 in cognitive functioning, and differed as a function of diagnosis. Results suggest interventions targeting mGluR5 may help bolster cognitive difficulties, highlighting the importance of employing different mGluR5 directed treatment strategies in MDD and PTSD.