Reliability of Functional and Diffusion MR Imaging Near Cerebral Cavernous Malformations

M. Colasurdo,H. Chen,R. Navarra,E. Piccirilli,A. Delli Pizzi,V. Panara,M. Caulo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7765
IF: 4.9661
2023-02-02
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Abstract:BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Surgical resection of cerebral cavernous malformations close to eloquent regions frequently uses fMRI and DTI for surgical planning to best preserve neurologic function. This study investigates the reliability of fMRI and DTI near cerebral cavernous malformations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with cerebral cavernous malformations undergoing presurgical fMRI and DTI mapping were identified. Each cerebral cavernous malformation was hand-contoured; 2 sequential 4-mm expansion shells (S1 and S2) were created, generating 2 ROIs and 2 contralateral controls. Fractional anisotropy and regional homogeneity measurements were then extracted from each ROI and compared with the contralateral controls. Reliability, accuracy, and precision were compared as appropriate. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients were identified and included. Errors of fractional anisotropy were significantly lower than those of regional homogeneity in S1 and S2 ( P .05), regional homogeneity was biased toward lower signals in S1 and S2 ( P < .05), an effect that was attenuated with distance from cerebral cavernous malformations ( P < .05). Fractional anisotropy measurements were also more precise than regional homogeneity in S1 and S2 ( P < .001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that hemosiderin-rich lesions such as cerebral cavernous malformations may lead to artifactual depression of fMRI signals and that clinicians and surgeons should interpret fMRI studies near cerebral cavernous malformations with caution. While fMRI is considerably affected by cerebral cavernous malformation–related artifacts, DTI appears to be relatively unaffected and remains a reliable imaging technique near cerebral cavernous malformations.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?