Abstract:Background: Violent attacks on and interferences with hospitals, ambulances, health workers, and patients during conflict destroy vital health services during a time when they are most needed and undermine the long-term capacity of the health system. In Syria, such attacks have been frequent and intense and represent grave violations of the Geneva Conventions, but the number reported has varied considerably. A systematic mechanism to document these attacks could assist in designing more protection strategies and play a critical role in influencing policy, promoting justice, and addressing the health needs of the population. Methods and findings: We developed a mobile data collection questionnaire to collect data on incidents of attacks on healthcare directly from the field. Data collectors from the Syrian American Medical Society (SAMS), using the tool or a text messaging system, recorded information on incidents across four of Syria's northern governorates (Aleppo, Idleb, Hama, and Homs) from January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016. SAMS recorded a total of 200 attacks on healthcare in 2016, 102 of them using the mobile data collection tool. Direct attacks on health facilities comprised the majority of attacks recorded (88.0%; n = 176). One hundred and twelve healthcare staff and 185 patients were killed in these incidents. Thirty-five percent of the facilities were attacked more than once over the data collection period; hospitals were significantly more likely to be attacked more than once compared to clinics and other types of healthcare facilities. Aerial bombs were used in the overwhelming majority of cases (91.5%). We also compared the SAMS data to a separate database developed by Physicians for Human Rights (PHR) based on media reports and matched the incidents to compare the results from the two methods (this analysis was limited to incidents at health facilities). Among 90 relevant incidents verified by PHR and 177 by SAMS, there were 60 that could be matched to each other, highlighting the differences in results from the two methods. This study is limited by the complexities of data collection in a conflict setting, only partial use of the standardized reporting tool, and the fact that limited accessibility of some health facilities and workers and may be biased towards the reporting of attacks on larger or more visible health facilities. Conclusions: The use of field data collectors and use of consistent definitions can play an important role in the tracking incidents of attacks on health services. A mobile systematic data collection tool can complement other methods for tracking incidents of attacks on healthcare and ensure the collection of detailed information about each attack that may assist in better advocacy, programs, and accountability but can be practically challenging. Comparing attacks between SAMS and PHR suggests that there may have been significantly more attacks than previously captured by any one methodology. This scale of attacks suggests that targeting of healthcare in Syria is systematic and highlights the failure of condemnation by the international community and medical groups working in Syria of such attacks to stop them.

Underestimating attacks: comparing two sources of publicly-available data about attacks on health care in 2017

Epidemic? The Attack Surface of German Hospitals during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Economic Impact of a Hospital Cyberattack in a National Health System: Descriptive Case Study

Using attack graphs to defend healthcare systems from cyberattacks: a longitudinal empirical study

Assessing the impact of health information exchange on hospital data breach risk

The elephant in the room: cybersecurity in healthcare

Attacks on healthcare facilities as an indicator of violence against civilians in Syria: An exploratory analysis of open-source data

Health Care and Cybersecurity: Bibliometric Analysis of the Literature

Are You the Outlier? Identifying Targets for Privacy Attacks on Health Datasets

Cyber threats to health information systems: A systematic review

Data Breaches in Healthcare Security Systems

A survey on techniques, methods and security approaches in big data healthcare

Reviewing the Health Care Impacts of Attacks on Critical Infrastructure

A Comparative Study of Terrorist Attacks Targeting Healthcare in North America vs Europe

Overcoming unreported violence using place‐based ambulance data: The case for mapping hotspots based on health data for crime prevention initiatives

Vulnerability to Cyberattacks and Sociotechnical Solutions for Health Care Systems: Systematic Review

Determining the scope of attacks on health in four governorates of Syria in 2016: Results of a field surveillance program

Healthcare Security Breaches in the United States: Insights and their Socio-Technical Implications

Artificial Intelligence-Based Ethical Hacking for Health Information Systems: Simulation Study

Incident Response and Threat Intelligence in Healthcare: A Study on Cybersecurity Incident Management

Security vulnerabilities in healthcare: an analysis of medical devices and software