Barriers Associated with Adherence to Cervical Cancer Screening Among Women Living with HIV in Nkhatabay District, Malawi: A Mixed-Methods Study
Phyllis Baluwa,Reuben Moyo,Masumbuko Baluwa,Lot Nyirenda
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ijwh.s442522
2024-03-20
International Journal of Women s Health
Abstract:Phyllis Chinsamba Baluwa, 1, 2 Reuben Christopher Moyo, 2 Masumbuko Albert Baluwa, 3 Lot Nyirenda 1 1 School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi; 2 Nkhatabay District Hospital, Nkhatabay Council, Nkhatabay, Malawi; 3 Department of Nursing and Midwifery, Mzuzu University, Mzuzu, Malawi Correspondence: Phyllis Chinsamba Baluwa, School of Global and Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Private Bag 360, Blantyre, Malawi, Tel +265999353175, Email Background: Cervical cancer (CC) incidence among Women Living with HIV (WLHIV) is high compared to the general population of women. As such, the Malawi National CC guideline recommends yearly screening among WLHIV. However, only 15.9% of WLHIV were screened nationally using Visual Inspection with Acetic Acid (VIA) by 2015 and there is no data regarding adherence and barriers to yearly screening. This study assessed adherence levels and associated barriers to yearly Cervical Cancer screening (CCS) among WLHIV. Methods: A cross-sectional concurrent mixed-method study was conducted at Nkhatabay District Hospital (NBDH) and Chintheche Rural Hospital (CRH) in Malawi. A sample of 205 WLHIV participated in quantitative strand and in-depth interviews were conducted with 10 health care workers and 10 WLHIV. Quantitative data were analysed using STATA version 16. Pearson's chi-square test and Multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed. P value was set at 0.05. Qualitative data were analysed deductively following six steps of thematic analysis. Results: Only 5.4% (n=11) of the participants had been screened as required. Women aged ≥ 45 had 4 times the odds of being screened for CC compared to ≤ 30 (OR 4.18, 95% CI 0.65– 26.8). WLHIV on ART > 10 years had more than 5 times the odds of being screened (OR 5.9, 95% CI 1.08– 33.19) compared with those on ART < 3 years. Use of male service providers (p =< 0.001), fear of the VIA procedure (p = < 0.001) and lack of interest (p = < 0.015) were significant barriers to adherence. Qualitative findings revealed a lack of knowledge regarding CCS protocol and the use of male providers. Conclusion: WLHIV face many challenges in accessing CCS and adherence to yearly CCS is very low. There is urgent need for targeted community awareness, scaling up of HPV tests and incorporation of CCS into routine integrated outreach services. Keywords: women living with HIV, cervical cancer screening, barriers, adherence Cervical cancer (CC) is a global public health concern due to its high morbidity and mortality among women. It is the second most common cancer and the main cause of cancer deaths among women globally. 1–3 Annually, approximately 604,127 women are diagnosed with CC worldwide, and the disease burden is higher in developing countries. 4 Women living with HIV (WLHIV) have a 4 to 6 times higher rate of developing CC than those who are HIV negative. 5–8 Malawi has the highest incidence rate of CC at both the regional and global levels, with an Age-Standardized incidence Rate (ASR) of 75.9 per 100,000 women. 5,9 Furthermore, the disease kills approximately 2314 lives every year, 5 making it a health threat to all women, specifically those who are HIV positive. The World Health Organization protocol recommends annual screening for this high-risk group for early detection and management. 10 However, CCS services face multiple challenges, and there is a need to investigate adherence levels to yearly screening and its associated barriers. There is compelling evidence that CC is preventable, treatable and curable when diagnosed in its earliest stage. 5,11,12 Routine CCS has proven to be effective in promoting the early identification of precancerous lesions, enhancing early referral for treatment and reducing the incidence rate by 80%. 12,13 Furthermore, the literature shows that scaling up CCS can reduce CC deaths by 70%, 6,14 proving that such services would greatly benefit WLHIV if they were to adhere to screening protocols. To facilitate coverage of the service, Visual Inspection with Acetic acid (VIA) is recommended to be the most cost-effective measure of CCS in resource-limited countries such as Malawi because it requires minimal and cheaper resources compared to other screening methods. 12,15 Despite the availability of the service and screening protocol, approximately half of WLHIV may not have had any screening for CC despite being in the high-risk group. 16 Furthermore, the literature on screening programs for WLHIV in developing countries shows that much attention -Abstract Truncated-
obstetrics & gynecology