Abstract:BackgroundDengue virus (DENV), responsible for a prevalent arthropod-borne viral illness, poses a substantial public health challenge worldwide. Clinically, DENV's manifestation often resembles that of other arboviruses, resulting in frequent healthcare visits and complicating the early diagnosis, which is critical for patient management. While virus isolation is a viable method, RT-qPCR assays yield significantly quicker results. Rapid immunochromatographic tests are available; yet, RT-qPCR not only matches their sensitivity but also provides distinct advantages in clinical laboratory settings. These include higher throughput and integrated, traceable quality control within each routine, offering less subjective and more dependable results. Maintaining high diagnostic standards for DENV is imperative. External quality assessment programs (EQAP) play a key role in enhancing laboratory diagnostic capabilities by monitoring and assessing diagnostic methods. This study evaluates the diagnostic efficacy of RT-qPCR for DENV using data from an EQAP conducted by a Brazilian provider, accredited by ABNT NBR ISO/IEC 17043:2011.MethodsThe quality control samples comprised lyophilized suspensions containing viable DENV particles, grown on vero cells (BCRJ 0245/ATCC CCL-81) under BSL-3 conditions. From February 2017 to November 2022, twenty-four EQAP survey rounds were carried out, each encompassing three samples, culminating in 1,153 data points. The evaluation metrics included participant numbers, adequacy percentage, sensitivity, specificity, and the incidence of false positives and negatives. The Mann-Kendall test assessed trends in these metrics over the survey rounds. The RT-qPCR kits employed by participants were classified either as in-vitro diagnostic (IVD) or as laboratory-developed tests (LDT). Kits that demonstrated high performance in terms of adequacy, sensitivity, and specificity were identified and listed.ResultsThe number of laboratories participating has increased. Starting with four in 2017, the program expanded to 28 by 2022. Laboratory accuracy was high during the evaluation period, with a median of 99% (97.8% in 2017 and 99.2% in 2022). The Mann-Kendall test indicated a significant trend of increased accuracy (p<0.001). Specificity remained stable at 98.8%, while sensitivity improved, with a median of 99.4%—rising from 93.3% in 2017 to 100% in 2022 (p<0.001). Only three false negatives were reported over three separate rounds, and six false positives were reported across four rounds. Both LDT and IVD RT-qPCR kits demonstrated high accuracy (99.4% and 98.4%, respectively). Biomanguinhos ZDC, Viasure ZDC, and ZDC Multiplex kits all showed 100% adequacy, sensitivity, and specificity.ConclusionsThis study highlights the increasing adoption of RT-qPCR for DENV detection, as evidenced by the growing number of laboratories in the EQAP program and the consistently high adequacy rates from 2017 to 2022. Nonetheless, the number of participating laboratories remains relatively small for a vast tropical country like Brazil. The high sensitivity and specificity, along with the infrequency of false results, underscore its effectiveness. The superior performance of certain kits suggests possible advancements in DENV diagnosis, contributing to global public health initiatives against this arboviral disease.

Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis: Assessing The Accuracy Of Rapid Immunochromatographic Tests In Dengue Diagnosis

A Novel Immunochromatographic Test Strip Versus A Commercial Rapid Diagnostic Test for the Detection of Imported Plasmodium Species in Guangxi Province, China: A Comparative Evaluation

Evaluation of two rapid immunochromatographic assays for diagnosis of dengue among Vietnamese febrile patients

Comparison of nonstructural protein-1 antigen detection by rapid and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay test and its correlation with polymerase chain reaction for early diagnosis of dengue

Clinical performance of the ImmuneMed Dengue NS1 Ag Rapid I test for the diagnosis of dengue fever: a diagnostic accuracy study

Diagnostic performance of the bioline dengue duo rapid test on symptomatic patients assisted at Armed Forces Hospital (Hfa) in Brasília, Brazil

Diagnostic Accuracy of Five Molecular Assays for the Detection of Dengue Virus

Rapid antigen tests for dengue virus serotypes and Zika virus in patient serum

Evaluation of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Nonstructural Protein 1 Ag-based Tests for Dengue Virus in Asian Population: a Meta-Analysis

Diagnostic accuracy of serological tests and kinetics of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 antibody: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Adapting Rapid Diagnostic Tests to Detect Historical Dengue Virus Infections

Diagnostic accuracy of Dengue NS1 lateral flow immunoassay in comparison to reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and enzyme linked Immunosorbent Assay

Envelope Protein in Differential Serodiagnosis of Dengue, Zika, and Chikungunya Viruses: A Systematic Review

Review: Progress in the Diagnosis of Dengue Virus Infections and Importance of Point of Care Test: a Review.

Comparative Study of Antigen Detection and Viral Nucleic Acid Assay for Early Detection of Dengue Infection

Evaluation of rapid diagnostic tests to detect dengue virus infections in Taiwan

B-215 Evaluating RT-qPCR for Dengue Virus Detection: Outcomes of a Brazilian External Quality Assessment Program

Comparison of the Sensitivity and Specificity of Commercial Anti-Dengue Virus IgG Tests to Identify Persons Eligible for Dengue Vaccination

Accuracy Of Rapid Diagnostic Test To Diagnose Malaria In Children Under 5 Years Of Age, A Meta-Analysis

Analysis of a Routinely Used Commercial Anti-Chikungunya IgM ELISA Reveals Cross-Reactivities with Dengue in Brazil: A New Challenge for Differential Diagnosis?

High value of rapid diagnostic tests to diagnose malaria within children: A systematic review meta-analysis