Abstract:Background: The guidelines for evaluation and diagnosis of stable chest pain (SCP) released by American societies in 2021 (2021 GL) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) in 2019 both recommended the estimation of pretest probability (PTP) by ESC-PTP model. Further risk assessment for the low-risk group according to 2021 GL (ESC-PTP ≤15%) is important but still remains unclear. Thus, the present study intended to comprehensively investigate the diagnostic and prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score (CACS) in these low-risk patients. Methods: From January 2017 to June 2019, we initially enrolled 8265 patients who were referred for CACS and coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) for the assessment of SCP. PTP of each patient was estimated by ESC-PTP model. Patients with ESC-PTP ≤15% were finally included and followed up for major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) and utilization of invasive procedures until June 2022. The degree of coronary artery disease (CAD) on CCTA was defined as no CAD (0%), nonobstructive CAD (1–49%) and obstructive CAD (≥50%). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards and Logistic regression models were used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), respectively. Results: A total of 5183 patients with ESC-PTP ≤15% were identified and 1.6% experienced MACE during the 4-year follow-up. The prevalence of no CAD and obstructive CAD decreased and increased significantly (p < 0.0001) in patients with higher CACS, respectively, and 62% had nonobstructive CAD among those with CACS >0, resulting in dramatically increasing ORs for any stenosis ≥50% and >0% across CACS strata. Higher CACS was also associated with an elevated risk of MACE (adjusted HR of 3.59, 13.47 and 6.58 when comparing CACS = 0–100, CACS >100 and CACS >0 to CACS = 0, respectively) and intensive utilization of invasive procedures. Conclusions: In patients for whom subsequent testing should be deferred according to 2021 GL, high CACS conveyed a significant probability of substantial stenoses and clinical endpoints, respectively. These findings support the potential role of CACS as a further risk assessment tool to improve clinical management in these low-risk patients.

Comparison of risk assessment strategies incorporating coronary artery calcium score with estimation of pretest probability to defer cardiovascular testing in patients with stable chest pain

Comparison of Risk Assessment Strategies for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Stable Chest Pain: A Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Study

Comparison of Different Investigation Strategies to Defer Cardiac Testing in Patients with Stable Chest Pain.

Coronary Calcification Improves the Estimation for Clinical Likelihood of Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease and Avoids Unnecessary Testing in Patients with Borderline Pretest Probability

Prognostic Significance of Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring and Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomographic Myocardial Perfusion Imaging on Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients at Low Risk for Suspected Coronary Artery Disease.

Comparison of the RF-CL and CACS-CL models to estimate the pretest probability of obstructive coronary artery disease and predict prognosis in patients with stable chest pain and diabetes mellitus

Coronary Artery Calcium Score Improves Risk Assessment of Symptomatic Patients in Low-Risk Group Based on Current Guidelines

Coronary Artery Calcium Score–Weighted Clinical Likelihood Model Performance in Patients with Stable Chest Pain and Coronary Artery Calcium Scores of Zero

Coronary computed tomographic angiography for patients with low-to-intermediate risk chest pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Risk Stratification in Chest Pain Patients Undergoing Nuclear Stress Testing

[A pretest model of obstructive coronary artery disease based on machine learning: from the C-Strat study]

Comparison of usual care and the HEART score for effectively and safely discharging patients with low-risk chest pain in the emergency department: would the score always help?

Coronary artery calcium score and pre-test probabilities as gatekeepers to predict and rule out perfusion defects in positron emission tomography

Establishment and effectiveness evaluation of pre-test probability model of coronary heart disease combined with cardiopulmonary exercise test indexes

ESC 2019 guidelines on chronic coronary syndromes: could calcium scoring improve detection of coronary artery disease in patients with low risk score. Findings from a retrospective cohort of patients in a district general hospital

The Value of a Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography plus Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Strategy for the Evaluation of Patients with Chronic Coronary Syndrome

Improving Risk Stratification in Patients with Chest Pain: the Erlanger HEARTS3 Score

Evaluating the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Guideline-Recommended and Contemporary Pretest Probability Models in a Mixed Asian Cohort: The Contribution of Coronary Artery Calcium

Clinical risk prediction, coronary computed tomography angiography, and cardiovascular events in new-onset chest pain: the PROMISE and SCOT-HEART trials

Coronary Artery Calcium Score Predicts Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Stable Chest Pain

Scoring systems for the triage and assessment of short-term cardiovascular risk in patients with acute chest pain