Abstract:Measuring soil texture and soil organic matter (SOM) is essential given the way they affect the availability of crop nutrients and water during the growing season. Among the different proximal soil sensing (PSS) technologies, diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS) has been deployed to conduct rapid soil measurements in situ. This technique is indirect and, therefore, requires site- and data-specific calibration. The quality of soil spectra is affected by the level of soil preparation and can be accessed through the repeatability (precision) and predictability (accuracy) of unbiased measurements and their combinations. The aim of this research was twofold: First, to develop a novel method to improve data processing, focusing on the reproducibility of individual soil reflectance spectral elements of the visible and near-infrared (vis–NIR) kind, obtained using a commercial portable soil profiling tool, and their direct link with a selected set of soil attributes. Second, to assess both the precision and accuracy of the vis–NIR hyperspectral soil reflectance measurements and their derivatives, while predicting the percentages of sand, clay and SOM content, in situ as well as in laboratory conditions. Nineteen locations in three agricultural fields were identified to represent an extensive range of soils, varying from sand to clay loam. All measurements were repeated three times and a ratio spread over error (RSE) was used as the main indicator of the ability of each spectral parameter to distinguish among field locations with different soil attributes. Both simple linear regression (SLR) and partial least squares regression (PLSR) models were used to define the predictability of % SOM, % sand, and % clay. The results indicated that when using a SLR, the standard error of prediction (SEP) for sand was about 10–12%, with no significant difference between in situ and ex situ measurements. The percentage of clay, on the other hand, had 3–4% SEP and 1–2% measurement precision (MP), indicating both the reproducibility of the spectra and the ability of a SLR to accurately predict clay. The SEP for SOM was only a quarter lower than the standard deviation of laboratory measurements, indicating that SLR is not an appropriate model for this soil property for the given set of soils. In addition, the MPs of around 2–4% indicated relatively strong spectra reproducibility, which indicated the need for more expanded models. This was apparent since the SEP of PLSR was always 2–3 times smaller than that of SLR. However, the relatively small number of test locations limited the ability to develop widely applicable calibration models. The most important finding in this study is that the majority of vis–NIR spectral measurements were sufficiently reproducible to be considered for distinguishing among diverse soil samples, while certain parts of the spectra indicate the capability to achieve this at α = 0.05. Therefore, the innovative methodology of evaluating both the precision and accuracy of DRS measurements will help future developers evaluate the robustness and applicability of any PSS instrument.

Repeatability of commercially available visible and near infrared proximal soil sensors

[Measurement of Soil Organic Matter with Near Infrared Spectroscopy Combined with Genetic Algorithm and Successive Projection Algorithm].

Evaluating the Precision and Accuracy of Proximal Soil vis–NIR Sensors for Estimating Soil Organic Matter and Texture

Sensor data fusion for soil health assessment

Improving In-Situ Estimation of Soil Profile Properties Using a Multi-Sensor Probe

Using Proximal Sensors to Continuously Monitor Agricultural Soil Physical Conditions for Tillage Management

Comparing the reliability of two soil moisture probes for high clay content NSW soils

Assessment of Soil Properties in Situ Using a Prototype Portable MIR Spectrometer in Two Agricultural Fields

Multi-Sensor Soil Probe and Machine Learning Modeling for Predicting Soil Properties

Analysis of the Accuracy of an FDR Sensor in Soil Moisture Measurement under Laboratory and Field Conditions

Visible, near infrared, mid infrared or combined diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for simultaneous assessment of various soil properties

In situ and laboratory soil spectroscopy with portable visible-to-near-infrared and mid-infrared instruments for the assessment of organic carbon in soils

In Situ Measurement of Some Soil Properties in Paddy Soil Using Visible and Near-Infrared Spectroscopy.

Using Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy as a High Throughput Method for Quantifying Soil C and N and Their Distribution in Particulate and Mineral-Associated Organic Matter Fractions

Evaluating the accuracy and usefulness of commercially-available proximal soil mapping services for grassland nutrient management planning and soil health monitoring

A New Optical Remote Sensing Technique for High-Resolution Mapping of Soil Moisture

Monitoring organic carbon, total nitrogen, and pH for reclaimed soils using field reflectance spectroscopy

Active‐Optical Reflectance Sensing Corn Algorithms Evaluated over the United States Midwest Corn Belt

Soilytics, replacing chemistry with physics: hyperspectral infrared imaging replaces testing by loss on ignition organic matter method

Simultaneous Measurement of Multiple Soil Properties Through Proximal Sensor Data Fusion: A Case Study

Harvest Timing of Standing Corn Using Near-Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy