Abstract:The generalized Riemann problem (GRP) scheme for the Euler equations and gas-kinetic scheme (GKS) for the Boltzmann equation are two high resolution shock capturing schemes for fluid simulations. The difference is that one is based on the characteristics of the inviscid Euler equations and their wave interactions, and the other is based on the particle transport and collisions. The similarity between them is that both methods can use identical MUSCL-type initial reconstructions around a cell interface, and the spatial slopes on both sides of a cell interface involve in the gas evolution process and the construction of a time-dependent flux function. Although both methods have been applied successfully to the inviscid compressible flow computations, their performances have never been compared. Since both methods use the same initial reconstruction, any difference is solely coming from different underlying mechanism in their flux evaluation. Therefore, such a comparison is important to help us to understand the correspondence between physical modeling and numerical performances. Since GRP is so faithfully solving the inviscid Euler equations, the comparison can be also used to show the validity of solving the Euler equations itself. The numerical comparison shows that the GRP exhibits a slightly better computational efficiency, and has comparable accuracy with GKS for the Euler solutions in 1D case, but the GKS is more robust than GRP. For the 2D high Mach number flow simulations, the GKS is absent from the shock instability and converges to the steady state solutions faster than the GRP. The GRP has carbuncle phenomena, likes a cloud hanging over exact Riemann solvers. The GRP and GKS use different physical processes to describe the flow motion starting from a discontinuity. One is based on the assumption of equilibrium state with infinite number of particle collisions, and the other starts from the non-equilibrium free transport process to evolve into an equilibrium one through particle collisions. The different mechanism in the flux evaluation deviates their numerical performance. Through this study, we may conclude scientifically that it may NOT be valid to use the Euler equations as governing equations to construct numerical fluxes in a discretized space with limited cell resolution. To adapt the Navier–Stokes (NS) equations is NOT valid either because the NS equations describe the flow behavior on the hydrodynamic scale and have no any corresponding physics starting from a discontinuity. This fact alludes to the consistency of the Euler and Navier–Stokes equations with the continuum assumption and the necessity of a direct modeling of the physical process in the discretized space in the construction of numerical scheme when modeling very high Mach number flows. The development of numerical algorithm is similar to the modeling process in deriving the governing equations, but the control volume here cannot be shrunk to zero.

A GRP-based tangential effects preserving, high resolution and efficient ghost fluid method for the simulation of two-dimensional multi-medium compressible flows

An Adaptive Ghost Fluid Finite Volume Method for Compressible Gas-Water Simulations

A Generalized Coupled Level Set/volume-of-fluid/ghost Fluid Method for Detailed Simulation of Gas-Liquid Flows.

A Three-Dimensional Finite Volume Method for Conservation Laws in Conjunction with Modified Solution for Nonlinear Coupled Constitutive Relations

An adaptive GRP scheme for compressible fluid flows

AN IMPROVED GHOST-CELL IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHOD FOR SOLVING SUPERSONIC FLOW PROBLEMS

A Viscous and Heat Conducting Ghost Fluid Method for Multi-Fluid Simulations

A GPU accelerated three-dimensional ghost cell method with an improved implicit surface representation for complex rigid or flexible boundary flows

A Third-Order Accurate Direct Eulerian GRP Scheme for the Euler Equations in Gas Dynamics.

A hybrid WENO method with modified ghost fluid method for compressible two-medium flow problems

Simulation of Expansion of High Pressure Bubble under Water in Complex Calculation Region using NGFM in Cartesian Coordinate System

Further acceleration of multiscale simulation of rarefied gas flow via a generalized boundary treatment

Comparison of the Generalized Riemann Solver and the Gas-Kinetic Scheme for Inviscid Compressible Flow Simulations

A Direct Eulerian GRP Scheme for Spherically Symmetric General Relativistic Hydrodynamics

Handling Solid-Fluid Interfaces for Viscous Flows: Explicit Jump Approximation Vs. Ghost Cell Approaches

An Improved Hybrid Cartesian/immersed Boundary Method for Fluid–solid Flows

Numerical Simulation of Underwater Explosion Bubble with a Refined Interface Treatment

On SPH Method with Treatment of Gas-Liquid Interface Boundary Conditions

A second-order direct Eulerian GRP scheme for ten-moment Gaussian closure equations with source terms

Simulation of Water Droplet Merging under Shock Wave Using Real Ghost Fluid Method