Abstract:Poor representation of pregnant and lactating women and people in clinical trials has marginalised their health concerns and denied the maternal–fetal/infant dyad benefits of innovation in therapeutic research and development. This mixed-methods systematic review synthesised factors affecting the participation of pregnant and lactating women in clinical trials, across all levels of the research ecosystem. We searched 8 databases from inception to 14 February 2024 to identify qualitative, quantitative, and mixed-methods studies that described factors affecting participation of pregnant and lactating women in vaccine and therapeutic clinical trials in any setting. We used thematic synthesis to analyse the qualitative literature and assessed confidence in each qualitative review finding using the GRADE-CERQual approach. We compared quantitative data against the thematic synthesis findings to assess areas of convergence or divergence. We mapped review findings to the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Model of Behaviour (COM-B) to inform future development of behaviour change strategies. We included 60 papers from 27 countries. We grouped 24 review findings under 5 overarching themes: (a) interplay between perceived risks and benefits of participation in women's decision-making; (b) engagement between women and the medical and research ecosystems; (c) gender norms and decision-making autonomy; (d) factors affecting clinical trial recruitment; and (e) upstream factors in the research ecosystem. Women's willingness to participate in trials was affected by: perceived risk of the health condition weighed against an intervention's risks and benefits, therapeutic optimism, intervention acceptability, expectations of receiving higher quality care in a trial, altruistic motivations, intimate relationship dynamics, and power and trust in medicine and research. Health workers supported women's participation in trials when they perceived clinical equipoise, had hope for novel therapeutic applications, and were convinced an intervention was safe. For research staff, developing reciprocal relationships with health workers, having access to resources for trial implementation, ensuring the trial was visible to potential participants and health workers, implementing a woman-centred approach when communicating with potential participants, and emotional orientations towards the trial were factors perceived to affect recruitment. For study investigators and ethics committees, the complexities and subjectivities in risk assessments and trial design, and limited funding of such trials contributed to their reluctance in leading and approving such trials. All included studies focused on factors affecting participation of cisgender pregnant women in clinical trials; future research should consider other pregnancy-capable populations, including transgender and nonbinary people. This systematic review highlights diverse factors across multiple levels and stakeholders affecting the participation of pregnant and lactating women in clinical trials. By linking identified factors to frameworks of behaviour change, we have developed theoretically informed strategies that can help optimise pregnant and lactating women's engagement, participation, and trust in such trials.

Systematic Review of Women Leading and Participating in Nephrology Randomized Clinical Trials

Gender Disparities in Nephrology Trials: A Meta-Analysis of Enrollment Trends between 2000 and 2021

Trends and Influences in women authorship of randomized controlled trials in rheumatology: a comprehensive analysis of all published RCTs from 2009 to 2023

Representation of Racial and Ethnic Minorities in Nephrology Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Sex and Gender in Randomized Controlled Trials of Adults Receiving Maintenance Dialysis: A Meta-epidemiologic Study

A systematic review of ethnic minority participation in randomised controlled trials of systemic therapies for gynecological cancers

Strategies for enhancing the representation of women in clinical trials: an evidence map

Abstract 11028: Gender Inequality in Enrollment in Late-Breaking Cardiovascular Clinical Trials

Gender inequality in genitourinary malignancies clinical trials leadership

Female Enrollment in Rehabilitation Trials: A Systematic Review of Reporting sex, and Female Participation in Randomized Controlled Trials of Post-Stroke Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Over 50 Years.

Assessing recruitment and retention strategies in clinical trials for inequitable populations in systemic lupus erythematosus: A cross-sectional analysis

Global Capacity for Clinical Research in Nephrology: a Survey by the International Society of Nephrology

Perspectives of Nephrologists on Gender Disparities in Access to Kidney Transplantation

Evaluation of gender trends in first authorship in nephrology publications in four major US journals in the last decade

Representation of Chronic Kidney Disease in Randomized Controlled Trials Among Patients With Heart failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review

Abstract WMP58: Underrepresentation of Racial and Ethnic Minorities in Stroke Clinical Trials

Factors influencing the participation of pregnant and lactating women in clinical trials: A mixed-methods systematic review

Women’s leadership in academic medicine: a systematic review of extent, condition and interventions

Is there an editorial glass ceiling? Editorial leadership in nephrology and transplantation journals: A gender‐based cross‐sectional analysis

Gender gap in cardiothoracic surgery randomized controlled trial and post-hoc analysis of randomized controlled trial authorship from 2014 to 2020

Representation of women in clinical trials supporting FDA‐approval of contemporary cancer therapies