Abstract:U.S.sanctions are based on U.S. foreign policy concerns about international terrorism, proliferation of weapons of mass destruction(WMD), national security, and communism. U.S. sanctions against North Korea began in earnest after North Korea's first nuclear test in 2006 and its fourth nuclear test and long-range missile launch in 2016. The U.S. has imposed sanctions on North Korea under the Trading with the Enemy Act (TWEA) and the International Emergency Powers Act (IEEPA), which are comprehensive sanctions measures. The U.S. has imposed sanctions on North Korea since the Korean War in 1950, and since 2016, the U.S. sanctions program has constituted the most powerful all-round pressure tool in the history of the U.S. sanctions program. U.S. sanctions are binding because they are centered on the U.S. Department of the Treasury's Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC), which can impose substantial sanctions on violators through “secondary sanctions”. However, given that there have been cases where U.S. sanctions have been relaxed or completely lifted due to changes in U.S. policy or negotiations with sanctioned countries or normalization of relations, it is possible to predict that U.S. unilateral sanctions on North Korea could also be relaxed or lifted. Through a detailed analysis of the cases of Vietnam and Iran, which are representative of the successes and failures of the U.S. in easing and lifting unilateral sanctions, we analyze the implications and prospects of easing and lifting U.S. unilateral sanctions on North Korea according to the trend of denuclearization negotiations between North Korea and the United States. The fact that the U.S. has pursued comprehensive agreements and phased sanctions relief in its sanctions relief and lifting process; that it has not lifted economic sanctions until the diplomatic objectives it sought to achieve through economic sanctions were met, even if it took a long time; and that it has reimposed sanctions even after reaching agreements through comprehensive agreements, utilizing snapback provisions if the sanctioned country did not implement the agreement in good faith and did not meet U.S. political and diplomatic interests have important implications for the sanctions relief and lifting process. It is important to note that even if the U.S. eventually reaches a comprehensive agreement through denuclearization negotiations with North Korea, sanctions relief could be delayed for a significant period of time or reimposed if North Korea fails to properly implement its nuclear disabling measures. In addition, it is important to monitor the progress of the U.S. sanctions removal process and the North Korea-U.S. denuclearization negotiations and prepare an action plan for each scenario in advance for inter-Korean exchange and cooperation projects and North Korea policy.

Sanctions against North Korea: A Descriptive Analysis of their Economic Impact (2000–2020)

Economic sanctions against North Korea: The pivotal role of US–China cooperation

Sanctions for Nuclear Inhibition: Comparing Sanction Conditions between Iran and North Korea

The economic effects of international sanctions: An event study

The Effectiveness of UNSC Economic Sanctions on Byungjin Policy, 2013-2019

United Nations Sanctions on North Korea's Luxury Goods Imports: Impact and Implications

The preliminary impact of sanctions on cooperation between Russia and the Republic of Korea

U.S. ECONOMIC SANCTIONS: an Empirical Study

The impact of economic sanctions on international trade: How do threatened sanctions compare with imposed sanctions?

Research on U.S. Economic Sanctions on North Korea and the lifting process: Focusing on the lifting of Vietnam and Iran

How Do US Economic Sanctions Affect EU's Trade with Target Countries?

The Study on Factors Affecting the Effectiveness of Economic Sanctions

The impact of financial sanctions on financial risk of target countries

The impact of economic sanctions on health and health systems in low-income and middle-income countries: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

Impact of Sanctions Policy Shifts: A Case Study of the United States and Cuba, 1994–2020

The futility of economic sanctions in a globalized and interdependent world: a data-driven game theoretical study

How Do Economic Sanctions Affect Public Opinion and Consumer Behavior in Target States? Evidence from China's Economic Sanctions on South Korea

Economic sanctions and agricultural trade

The gift of sanctions: an analysis of assessments of the Russian economy, 2022–2023

Analyzing the effects of economic sanctions: Recent theory, data, and quantification

The impact of international sanctions on environmental performance