Abstract:Importance The associations between angiographic findings and post-percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) fractional flow reserve (FFR) and their clinical relevance according to residual functional disease burden have not been thoroughly investigated. Objectives To evaluate the association of angiographic and physiologic parameters according to residual functional disease burden after drug-eluting stent implantation. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study population was from the International Post-PCI FFR registry, which incorporated 4 registries from Korea, China, and Japan. Patients who underwent angiographically successful second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation and post-PCI FFR measurement were included in the analysis. The patients were divided into 3 groups according to the residual disease burden (post-PCI FFR <= 0.80 [residual ischemia], 0.81-0.86 [suboptimal], and >0.86 [optimal]). The data were collected from August 23, 2018, to June 11, 2019, and the current analysis was performed from January 11, 2022, to October 7, 2023. Exposures Angiographic parameters and post-PCI FFR. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF), defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel-related myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at 2 years. Results In this cohort of 2147 patients, the mean (SD) age was 64.3 (10.0) years, and 1644 patients (76.6%) were men. Based on the post-PCI physiologic status, 269 patients (12.5%) had residual ischemia, 551 (25.7%) had suboptimal results, and 1327 (61.8%) had optimal results. Angiographic parameters had poor correlations with post-PCI FFR (r < 0.20). Post-PCI FFR was isolated from all angiographic parameters in the unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis. Post-PCI FFR was associated with the occurrence of TVF (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] per post-PCI FFR 0.01 increase, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.92-0.97]; P < .001), but angiographic parameters were not. The residual ischemia group had a significantly higher rate of TVF than the suboptimal group (AHR, 1.75 [95% CI, 1.08-2.83]; P = .02) and the optimal group (AHR, 2.94 [95% CI, 1.82-4.73]; P < .001). The TVR in the residual ischemia group was predominantly associated with TVR in the nonstented segment (14 [53.8%]), unlike the other 2 groups (3 [10.0%] in the suboptimal group and 13 [30.2%] in the optimal group). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study of the International Post-PCI FFR registry, a low degree of associations were observed between angiographic and physiologic parameters after PCI. Post-PCI FFR, unlike angiographic parameters, was associated with clinical events and the distribution of clinical events. The current study supports the use of post-PCI FFR as a procedural quality metric and further prospective study is warranted.

Abnormal physiological findings after FFR-based revascularisation deferral are associated with worse prognosis in women

Sex Differences in Fractional Flow Reserve– or Intravascular Ultrasound–Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Sex Differences in Clinical Outcomes Associated with Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Clinical Implications of Three-Vessel Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Outcomes of Deferred Lesions with Angiographically Insignificant Stenosis but Low Fractional Flow Reserve.

Angiographic Findings and Post-Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Fractional Flow Reserve

High-Risk Morphological and Physiological Coronary Disease Attributes As Outcome Markers after Medical Treatment and Revascularization.

Differential Impact of Coronary Revascularization on Long-Term Clinical Outcome According to Coronary Flow Characteristics: Analysis of the International ILIAS Registry

Clinical Outcomes of Deferred Lesions by IVUS Versus FFR-Guided Treatment Decision.

Physiology- or Imaging-Guided Strategies for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis.

Differences in Plaque Characteristics and Myocardial Mass

Impact of Post-PCI FFR Stratified by Coronary Artery

Prognostic value of fractional flow reserve: linking physiologic severity to clinical outcomes.

Abstract 18406: Gender Influence on the Functional Significance of Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis

Differential Impact of Fractional Flow Reserve Measured After Coronary Stent Implantation by Left Ventricular Dysfunction

Fractional Flow Reserve or Intravascular Ultrasound for PCI.

Discordance Between Angiographic Assessment and Fractional Flow Reserve or Intravascular Ultrasound in Intermediate Coronary Lesions: A Post-hoc Analysis of the FLAVOUR Trial.

Combined assessment of fractional flow reserve, resting full-cycle ratio, and resting ratio of distal coronary to aortic pressure for clinical outcomes

Clinical Relevance of Functionally Insignificant Moderate Coronary Artery Stenosis Assessed by 3‐vessel Fractional Flow Reserve Measurement

Abstract 10967: Prognostic Value of a Novel Index: Computational Pressure-Flow Dynamics Derived Fractional Flow Reserve in Stable Coronary Artery Disease Patients with Nonischemic Lesions

Prognostic Implications of Fractional Flow Reserve after Coronary Stenting A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis