A single-item measure of self-rated mental health and psychological distress. In what situations can a single-item measure be useful?

Joanne M Stubbs,Helen M Achat
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10398562231151868
2023-01-20
Australasian Psychiatry
Abstract:Australasian Psychiatry, Ahead of Print. ObjectiveTo examine the association between self-rated mental health (SRMH) and psychological distress (PD) at multiple periods and subsequently assess the potential of SRMH as a screening tool.MethodStaff working at a designated COVID-19 hospital in Sydney, Australia during March to May 2020 completed the SRMH and Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (K10) within a larger survey examining the pandemic's impact on health and well-being. SRMH was assessed before the pandemic (baseline), during its first peak in 2020 (time 2) and several months later (time 3). K10 was assessed for time 2 and time 3. All assessments took place at time 3.ResultsAt time 2, 80% of respondents with high PD and 25% with low PD reported poor SRMH (χ2 = 21.3, p < .0001). At time 3, 90% with low PD reported good SRMH. Risk of high PD was greater for respondents with persistently poor SRMH (time 2: OR = 18.2, 95% CI = 7.7–42.8; time 3: OR = 14.4, 95% CI = 6.9–29.9) and, to a lesser extent, for those whose SRMH declined (time 2: OR = 11.6, 95% CI = 6.6–20.4; time 3: OR = 13.8, 95% CI = 2.9–66.9), compared to those with persistently good SRMH.ConclusionsDuring a crisis SRMH can identify the majority of those most likely to benefit from additional assessment and support. Persistently poor SRMH indicates highest risk, detectable from routine screening.
psychiatry
What problem does this paper attempt to address?