Abstract:The vast majority of adolescents recognize that bullying is morally wrong, yet bullying remains a problem in secondary schools, indicating young people may disengage from their moral values to engage in bullying. But it is unclear whether the same mechanisms enabling moral disengagement are active for bully/victims (who both bully and are bullied) as for pure bullies (who are not targets of bullying). This study tested the hypotheses that mechanisms of moral disengagement, including blaming the victim and minimizing the impact of bullying, may operate differently in bully/victims compared to pure bullies. From a sample of 1895 students from grades 7-9 (50.6% female; 83.4% from English speaking homes), 1870 provided self-reports on bullying involvement and mechanisms of moral disengagement associated with bullying. Two cut-offs were compared for bullying involvement (as perpetrator and as target of bullying) during the previous school term: a conservative cut-off (every few weeks or more often) and a liberal cut-off (once-or-twice). Using the conservative cut-off, both pure bullies and bully/victims enlisted moral disengagement mechanisms to justify bullying more than did uninvolved students and pure victims, with no significant difference in scores on any of the moral disengagement scales between pure bullies and bully/victims. For the liberal cut-off, bully/victims reported lower overall moral disengagement scores than did pure bullies, and specifically less distortion of consequences, diffusion of responsibility, and euphemistic labeling. This study advances bullying research by extending the role of moral disengagement in bullying episodes beyond pure bullies to victims, both pure victims and bully/victims. Examination of specific moral disengagement mechanisms and the extent of involvement in bullying enabled a more nuanced differentiation between the bullying groups. These results will inform future interventions aimed at reducing the use of moral disengagement mechanisms that sustain bullying and victimization. Targeted interventions are needed to challenge specific moral disengagement mechanisms from the perspectives of pure bullies and bully/victims.

Minimizing responsibility in the aggressive dynamics of bullying and its impact on other strategies of moral disengagement: a longitudinal study

Aggression, Moral Disengagement and Empathy. A Longitudinal Study Within the Interpersonal Dynamics of Bullying

Moral Disengagement of Pure Bullies and Bully/Victims: Shared and Distinct Mechanisms

Situationally Selective Activation of Moral Disengagement Mechanisms in School Bullying: A Repeated Within-Subjects Experimental Study

Mechanisms of Moral Disengagement and Their Associations With Indirect Bullying, Direct Bullying, and Pro-Aggressive Bystander Behavior

Moral disengagement mechanisms and its relationship with aggression and bullying behaviour among school children and youth at psychosocial risk

The role of moral disengagement in youth bullying behaviour

Face-to-Face and Online: An Investigation of Children’s and Adolescents’ Bullying Behavior Through the Lens of Moral Emotions and Judgments

Bystander behavior in bullying situations: Basic moral sensitivity, moral disengagement and defender self-efficacy

The Effects of Forgiveness, Gratitude, and Self-Control on Reactive and Proactive Aggression in Bullying

Concurrent Associations Between Callous-Unemotional Traits, Moral Disengagement, and Bullying Perpetration in Adolescence

The indirect association between moral disengagement and bystander behaviors in school bullying through motivation: Structural equation modelling and mediation analysis

Affective Empathy and Moral Disengagement Related to Late Adolescent Bullying Perpetration

Longitudinal link between moral disengagement and bullying among children and adolescents: A systematic review

Individual moral disengagement and bystander behavior in bullying: The role of moral distress and collective moral disengagement.

Why Do Bystanders of Bullying Help or Not? A Multidimensional Model

Stability and change in longitudinal patterns of antisocial behaviors: The role of social and emotional competencies, empathy, and morality

Tempted to join in or not? Moral temptation and self-reported behaviour in bullying situations

Social Status and Emotional Competence in Bullying: A Longitudinal Study of the Transition From Kindergarten to Primary School

School Climate, Moral Disengagement and, Empathy as Predictors of Bullying in Adolescents

Dispositional and situational moral emotions, bullying and prosocial behavior in adolescence