Effects of push-pull injection-suction spacing on sand biocementation treatment

Armstrong Ighodalo Omoregie,Dominic Ek Leong Ong,Phua Ye Li,Nurnajwani Senian,Ngu Lock Hei,Annette Esnault-Filet,Khalida Muda,Peter Morin Nissom
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/jgere.22.00053
2023-01-20
Geotechnical Research
Abstract:The process of ureolysis-driven biocementation is used to improve granular soils. The precipitation of calcium carbonate (CaCO 3 ) crystals results from the reactions of urease generated by ureolytic bacteria and chemical reagents, which strengthen or bind soil particles together. Using a lab-based scaled physical model, this paper investigated the influence of selected spacing intervals (107 mm, 214 mm and 321 mm) on the effectiveness of biocementation via the injection-suction or 'push-pull' approach. Polystyrene moulds were used to create soil specimens. It was then injected with 6 cycles of the treatment solutions at the intervals stated. The compressive strengths and CaCO 3 content of the biocemented soil specimens were measured after curing, as well as scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and effluent analysis (pH and ammonium measurements). The biocemented soil specimens with different spacing intervals obtained compressive strengths of 2.53 ±1.06 to 4.2 ±2.3 MPa, while the CaCO 3 contents were from 2.78 ±0.3 to 11.16 ±1.5%, respectively. The elemental compositions and bonding of CaCO 3 precipitates in the biocemented soil were confirmed by EDS and FTIR spectra, while SEM micrographs revealed chip-like and irregular rhombohedral crystal forms. The results demonstrated that injection spacing had an effect on MICP-treated biocemented soil.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?