Preference Signaling and the Integrated Plastic Surgery Match: A National Survey Study
Amanda R Sergesketter,Ethan Song,Ronnie L Shammas,William M Tian,Kyle R Eberlin,Jason H Ko,Adeyiza O Momoh,Alison Snyder-Warwick,Brett T Phillips,Amanda R. Sergesketter,Ronnie L. Shammas,William M. Tian,Kyle R. Eberlin,Jason H. Ko,Adeyiza O. Momoh,Brett T. Phillips
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.01.011
IF: 3.524
2024-03-30
Journal of Surgical Education
Abstract:Objective Rooted in economics market strategies, preference signaling was introduced to the Plastic Surgery Common Application (PSCA) in 2022 for integrated plastic surgery residency applicants. This study surveyed program and applicant experience with preference signaling and assessed how preference signals influenced likelihood of interview invitations. Design Two online surveys were designed and distributed to all program directors and 2022-2023 applicants to integrated plastic surgery. Opinions regarding the utility of preference signaling were solicited, and the influence of preference signals on likelihood of interview offers was assessed. Setting All integrated plastic surgery programs. Participants All 88 program directors and 2022-2023 applicants to integrated plastic surgery. Results A total of 45 programs and 99 applicants completed the survey (response rates, 54.2% and 34.2%, respectively). Overall, 79.6% of applicants and 68.9% of programs reported that preference signals were a useful addition to the application cycle. Programs reported that 41.4% of students who sent preference signals received interview offers, compared to 84.6% of home students, 64.8% of away rotators, and 7.1% of other applicants; overall, students who signaled were 5.8 times more likely to receive an interview offer compared to students who were not home students and did not rotate or signal. After multivariable adjustment, programs with higher Doximity rankings, numbers of away rotators, and numbers of integrated residents per year received more preference signals (all p < 0.05). Conclusions Applicants and programs report that preference signaling was a useful addition to the integrated plastic surgery application cycle. Sending preference signals resulted in a higher likelihood of interview offers among nonrotators. Preference signaling may be a useful tool to reduce congestion in the integrated plastic surgery application cycle.
surgery,education, scientific disciplines