Abstract:In matched observational studies, the inferred causal conclusions pretending that matching has taken into account all confounding can be sensitive to unmeasured confounding. In such cases, a sensitivity analysis is often conducted, which investigates whether the observed association between treatment and outcome is due to effects caused by the treatment or it is due to hidden confounding. In general, a sensitivity analysis tries to infer the minimum amount of hidden biases needed in order to explain away the observed association between treatment and outcome, assuming that the treatment has no effect. If the needed bias is large, then the treatment is likely to have significant effects. The Rosenbaum sensitivity analysis is a modern approach for conducting sensitivity analysis for matched observational studies. It investigates what magnitude the maximum of the hidden biases from all matched sets needs to be in order to explain away the observed association, assuming that the treatment has no effect. However, such a sensitivity analysis can be overly conservative and pessimistic, especially when the investigators believe that some matched sets may have exceptionally large hidden biases. In this paper, we generalize Rosenbaum's framework to conduct sensitivity analysis on quantiles of hidden biases from all matched sets, which are more robust than the maximum. Moreover, we demonstrate that the proposed sensitivity analysis on all quantiles of hidden biases is simultaneously valid and is thus a free lunch added to the conventional sensitivity analysis. The proposed approach works for general outcomes, general matched studies and general test statistics. Finally, we demonstrate that the proposed sensitivity analysis also works for bounded null hypotheses as long as the test statistic satisfies certain properties. An R package implementing the proposed method is also available online.

Random forest based quantile-oriented sensitivity analysis indices estimation

Random Forest based Qantile Oriented Sensitivity Analysis indices estimation

From regression rank scores to robust inference for censored quantile regression

Compromised imputation based mean estimators using robust quantile regression

Fast Algorithms for Quantile Regression with Selection

Estimating Quantile Sensitivities

Sensitivity analysis for inverse probability weighting estimators via the percentile bootstrap

Conditional Monte Carlo Estimation of Quantile Sensitivities

Small Area Quantile Estimation

Quantile Regression using Random Forest Proximities

Efficient slope reliability and sensitivity analysis using quantile-based first-order second-moment method

Quantization‐Based Latin Hypercube Sampling for Dependent Inputs With an Application to Sensitivity Analysis of Environmental Models

Global Censored Quantile Random Forest

Adaptive Sequential Procedures for Quantile Selection with Importance Sampling

Empirical Likelihood Based Tests for Detecting the Presence of Significant Predictors in Marginal Quantile Regression

Bootstrap Inference for Panel Data Quantile Regression

Quantile regression outcome-adaptive lasso: variable selection for causal quantile treatment effect estimation

Sensitivity Analysis for Quantiles of Hidden Biases in Matched Observational Studies

Censored Quantile Regression Forests

Sensitivity estimation of conditional value at risk using randomized quasi-Monte Carlo

Nearly Semiparametric Efficient Estimation of Quantile Regression