Predictability of orthodontic tooth movement with aligners: effect of treatment design

Tommaso Castroflorio,Ambra Sedran,Simone Parrini,Francesco Garino,Matteo Reverdito,Riccardo Capuozzo,Sabrina Mutinelli,Simonas Grybauskas,Mantas Vaitiekūnas,Andrea Deregibus
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40510-022-00453-0
IF: 3.247
2023-01-17
Progress in Orthodontics
Abstract:The present study was designed to define: (1) which are the less predictable OTM with Invisalign aligners when the treatment plan is designed by expert operators, (2) if the presence and shape of attachments influence the predictability of OTM and (3) if patients' demographics influence OTM predictability. The sample comprises 79 prospectively recruited patients (mean age 30.8 years; SD 12.0; 23 M, 56 F), treated by expert operators with an average of 27 aligners (SD 15) in the maxillary arch and 25 aligners (SD 11) in the mandibular arch. Post-treatment digital models and final virtual treatment plan models were exported from ClinCheck ® software as STL files and subsequently imported into Geomagic Qualify ® software, to compare final teeth positions. The differences were calculated and tested for statistical significance for each tooth in the mesial–distal, vestibular–lingual and occlusal–gingival directions, as well as for angulation, inclination and rotation. In addition, the statistical significance of categorical variables was tested.
dentistry, oral surgery & medicine
What problem does this paper attempt to address?