Abstract:Lung cancer screening (LCS) is severely under-utilized by eligible individuals living in rural areas. The purpose of this study is to increase LCS in a rural population by applying a combined systems and design approach to identify needed health system-level changes and to proactively identify potential facilitators and roadblocks for the changes across multiple levels in an academic medical center. Data to identify system-level processes and gaps included LCS referral and screening data, 26 stakeholder interviews with providers, clinical staff and potential eligible patients, review of health record fields for smoking history, and LCS process mapping, including potential pathways of referral and notification of eligibility. Design thinking was applied by assessing potential facilitators and roadblocks across different levels for changes, including higher-level institution commitment, financial implications of increased LCS (i.e., return on investment), gaps in process-level resources (e.g., accredited scanners, time for shared decision making), and overall stigma related to smoking. Results indicated overall support for LCS by all stakeholders but a lack of knowledge about LCS among potential patients and challenges to easily identify eligible patients and finding time for shared-decision making and smoking cessation required for LCS referrals among providers. Further investigation showed lack of full EHR documentation of smoking history due partially to insufficient fields in the EHR to document full smoking history or to calculate pack years which led to largely inaccurate automated LCS eligibility notifications. Targeted interventions based on the system findings include adding smoking history fields and calculators in the EHR to adequately document smoking history and identify eligible patients, creating an education and question-based pamphlet for patients visiting primary care to prompt accurate history documentation and LCS conversation, provider letters to highlight an existing Lung Health Center resource for SDM and smoking cessation, avoiding stigmatizing language (e.g., "smoker"), and highlighting health versus cancer (Lung Health Check versus Lung Cancer Screening) in patient-facing materials. Application of design thinking led to identifying sustainable interventions within existing processes and arranging leadership meetings to establish LCS ROI and personnel/equipment justifications to support and sustain increased LCS referrals. Models of healthcare improvement, such as those promoted by the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, focus largely on system-level analyses without adequate attention to design thinking which may lead to interventions that are limited in scope or subject to obstacles that limit success. This study demonstrates that using wider and multiple lens for improving LCS in a rural population allows for human-centered and system-centered approaches that may better address gaps in care for individuals at high risk for inadequate care and provide them services that they deserve. Citation Format: Rian M. Hasson, Karen E. Schifferdecker, Shaun A. Golding, Shani Bardach, Linda M. Kinney, Maureen B. Boardman, Ellie Kyung, Sean R. Halloran, Samuel L. Youkilis, Amanda N. Perry, Vrushabh P. Ladage, Tom Bird. Use of a combined systems and design framework to assess and improve lung cancer screening for underserved rural population [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 15th AACR Conference on the Science of Cancer Health Disparities in Racial/Ethnic Minorities and the Medically Underserved; 2022 Sep 16-19; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2022;31(1 Suppl) nr A103.

Using the Framework for Reporting Adaptations and Modifications-Expanded (FRAME) to study adaptations in lung cancer screening delivery in the Veterans Health Administration: a cohort study

Proactively tailoring implementation: the case of shared decision-making for lung cancer screening across the VA New England Healthcare Network

Understanding Patient and Clinical Stakeholder Perspectives to Improve Adherence to Lung Cancer Screening

Protocol to evaluate an enterprise-wide initiative to increase access to lung cancer screening in the Veterans Health Administration

The FRAME-IS: a framework for documenting modifications to implementation strategies in healthcare

Successes and challenges of implementing a lung cancer screening program in federally qualified health centers: a qualitative analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening in the Veterans Health Administration

Application of the FRAME-IS to a multifaceted implementation strategy

Site-initiated adaptations in the implementation of an evidence-based inpatient walking program

Using Implementation Science to Disseminate a Lung Cancer Screening Education Intervention Through Community Health Workers

Implementation of Lung Cancer Screening in Primary Care and Pulmonary Clinics: Pragmatic Clinical Trial of Electronic Health Record-Integrated Everyday Shared Decision-Making Tool and Clinician-Facing Prompts

Abstract A103: Use of a combined systems and design framework to assess and improve lung cancer screening for underserved rural population

Rural barriers and facilitators of lung cancer screening program implementation in the veterans health administration: a qualitative study

Multilevel approaches to address disparities in lung cancer screening: a study protocol

Developing a systems-focused tool for modeling lung cancer screening resource needs

Examining cultural adaptations of the savvy caregiver program for Korean American caregivers using the framework for reporting adaptations and modifications-enhanced (FRAME)

Abstract A122: Development and pilot testing of an EHR-based provider-level intervention to promote equity in lung cancer screening

Adaptation of remote symptom monitoring using electronic patient-reported outcomes for implementation in real-world settings.

Abstract B085: Increasing utilization of breast cancer risk assessment tools: Identifying and adapting implementation strategies using multiple stakeholder groups

Using FRAME to characterize provider-identified adaptations to a stepped care intervention for adolescents and youth living with HIV in Kenya: a mixed methods approach

Health plan adaptations to a mailed outreach program for colorectal cancer screening among Medicaid and Medicare enrollees: the BeneFIT study