Abstract:Objectives: This study reports on the results of a project that was initiated by the German pension fund and the statutory health insurers and conducted in 2009 to 2010 with the goal of developing, arranging and testing instruments for quality assurance for the outcome (including patient satisfaction) in inpatient medical rehabilitation centres for children and adolescents. Method: After a 6-month concept phase in which instruments were developed using value benefit analyses, expert consensus procedures, surveys of centres, and qualitative (cognitive interviews) and quantitative (psychometric tests) pre-studies, data were collected in 23 child and adolescent rehabilitation centres using the instruments that had been developed. The project was limited to the following 4 main diagnoses: obesity, bronchial asthma, atopic eczema, and hyperkinetic disorders as well as related disorders (ICD: F90-F94). Children and adolescents over the age of 12 years were interviewed themselves, for younger children, the parents were interviewed. It was decided to include 7 constructs that can be considered as indicators of the quality of the outcome or of patient satisfaction: generic and disease-specific quality of life, perceived change in health, body function parameters (e. g., blood pressure), disease-related self-management, satisfaction of the children/adolescents with rehabilitation, and parent satisfaction. Results: With respect to quality of life, blood pressure, Munich fitness test and lung function parameters, low to medium effects were achieved; with respect to body mass index, SCORAD score and disease-related self-management, the effects were strong. The results can be summarised to the effect that rehabilitation generally achieves noticeable effects in the areas where the impairment is pronounced. In both the parent and the rehabilitation patient survey, there was a high level of satisfaction. The parents of rehab patients under the age of 12 years gave the centres an average assessment of 1.6 to 1.8; rehab patients over the age of 12 years gave the centres an average grade of 2.0 (1=very good to 5=very bad). The differences among the centres were very low after risk adjustment, especially for outcome quality. Conclusions: The strengths of the instruments that were developed are that a scientifically demanding quality measurement was conducted (e. g., combination of indirect and direct measurement of change, several methodological approaches to measuring results, wide range of endpoints analysed, homogeneous comparison groups, elaborate risk adjustment process). There are limitations, especially with respect to the rather great effort needed and not particularly high power for the comparison of centres. The German pension fund and the statutory health insurers are now discussing on the basis of the results of the project the routine implementation of quality assurance in children/adolescent rehabilitation and concrete steps that can be taken to implement it in routine health care.

Validation of the CaReQoL asthma: a patient reported outcome measure for monitoring the perceived effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in adult patients with severe refractory asthma

The patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL) burden of severe asthma in Europe (SHARP CRC) for specific subgroups

Australian adaptation and external validation of Commissioning for Quality in Rheumatoid Arthritis-RA-Patient Reported Experience Measure (CQRA-RA-PREM)

Understanding social dynamics and patient experience in out of hospital care: validation of a co-responsibility questionnaire (CoReCare)

A qualitative evaluation of a comprehensive self-management programme for COPD patients: effectiveness from the patients' perspective

Public involvement in health outcomes research: lessons learnt from the development of the recovering quality of life (ReQoL) measures

Evaluation of a short form for measuring health-related quality of life among pediatric asthma patients

The Reliever Reliance Test: evaluating a new tool to address SABA over-reliance

CAHQL: A Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument to Assess Health-Related Quality of Life in Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia

The HeartQoL: part II. Validation of a new core health-related quality of life questionnaire for patients with ischemic heart disease

Validation of the Onset of Effect Questionnaire in Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Convergent Validity and Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Maugeri Foundation Respiratory Failure Questionnaire (MRF-28) and the Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire (VQ11)

The construct validity, responsiveness, reliability and interpretability of the Recap of atopic eczema questionnaire (RECAP) in children

Caring for a Child with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Parents’ Quality of Life: Application of the CarerQol

Validating the HeartQoL questionnaire in patients with atrial fibrillation

The REal Life EVidence AssessmeNt Tool (RELEVANT): development of a novel quality assurance asset to rate observational comparative effectiveness research studies

Concurrent validity, cut-offs and ability to change of patient-reported outcome measures for rhinitis and asthma in MASK-air®

Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for Spanish adults with bronchiectasis: a systematic review of measurement properties.

Patient-reported outcome instruments that evaluate adherence behaviours in adults with asthma: a systematic review of measurement properties

[Outcome quality in rehabilitation of children and adolescents: results of project aiming at the development of a quality assurance programme]

An evaluation on reliability, validity and responsiveness of the revised edition of Asthma Control Questionnaire for patients with chest tightness variant asthma