Abstract:Three strictly comparable cross-section household dataset,related to 1988,1995 and 2001,are used to analyze the rapid yet unequal growth of wage and the sharp widening of wage structure.Earnings functions are compared and the increase in both the level and the inequality of wages are decomposed into their constituent elements.Distinctions are made between the variables likely to represent human capital,discrimination,and segmentation.The evidence suggests that productive characteristics were increasingly rewarded as marketization The Gini coefficient of earnings rose by 10.7 percentage points in the first phase from 1988 to 1995.Whereas the mean wage increased by 67 percent,the pay of the 10th percentile rose by only 22 percent,and that of the 90th percentile rose by 97 percent.These changes are much larger than those of the second phase from 1995 to 2001.Moreover,the returns to education rose sharply,as did the returns to occupation-specific skills.The initially slight inverse-U shape of the age-earnings profile became more pronounced: a change consistent with human capital theory.Thus the productive characteristics of workers were increasingly rewarded in the labor market.However,there were also signs of greater wage discrimination against women.Moreover,the market forces operating in the growing private sector and the relative immunity of the state sector from those forces generated greater wage segmentation among types of ownership,and provincial differences in the pace of reform and in economic growth created spatial segmentation in wages that could not be removed by the equilibrating movement of labor.Decomposition analyses were conducted in order to examine the contribution of particular characteristics to the rise in the Gini coefficient.Only a third of earnings inequality and its increase could be explained: the unobserved determinants are clearly important to the increase in earnings dispersion.The discrimination variables accounted for only a small part of the increase.The segmentation variables made the most important contribution,and that was mainly due to growing wage dispersion among provinces.This result is supported by other evidence of powerful divergence in mean earnings among provinces(Knight,Li and Zhao,2001).Some but not all components of human capital were disequalizing.These particular changes are likely to represent the stirring of labor market forces.

Sources of Wage Growth

Marketization and Unequal Growth of Wage: Their Extent and Influence Factors

Academic or vocational education? A comparison of the long-term wage development of academic and vocational tertiary degree holders

General Education, Vocational Education, and Labor-Market Outcomes over the Lifecycle

Earnings Dynamics and Firm-Level Shocks

Training and search on the job

Innovation and Skill Upgrading : The of External vs Internal Labor Markets

The Dynamics of Return Migration, Human Capital Accumulation, and Wage Assimilation

Skills, earnings, and employment: exploring causality in the estimation of returns to skills

Asymmetric Reciprocity and the Cyclical Behavior of Wages, Effort, and Job Creation

Different Degrees of Skill Obsolescence Across Hard and Soft Skills and the Role of Lifelong Learning for Labor Market Outcomes

Unraveling wage inequality: tangible and intangible assets, globalization and labor market regulations

Firms and the Intergenerational Transmission of Labor Market Advantage

Educational choice, initial wage and wage growth

Earnings Dynamics, Changing Job Skills, and STEM Careers*

Using Big Data to Decode Private Sector Wage Growth

Vocational education, tertiary education, and skill use across career stages

Wage Growth, Ability Sorting, and Location Choice at Labor-Force Entry: New Evidence from U.S. Census Data

Wage inequality and induced innovation in a classical-Marxian growth model

Human Capital Accumulation and Life-cycle Earning

Job Stability, Earnings Dynamics, and Life-Cycle Savings