(Digital Presentation) Non-Metallic Atom (B, C, N, O, P) Doped-Nickel Sulfide for Efficient Electrochemical Oxygen Evolution Reaction: A First-Principles Study
Xingqun Zheng,Shun Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1149/ma2023-01502593mtgabs
2023-08-28
ECS Meeting Abstracts
Abstract:Due to the relatively high energy barrier and the inertia involved in the 4e - process, oxygen evolution reaction (OER), greatly impedes the efficiency of water splitting devices. 1 Ni-based sulfides, especially Ni 3 S 2 based material has regarded as promising catalysts to replace noble OER catalysts due to its facile synthesis and good conductivity. 2 Nevertheless, the intrinsic activity of Ni 3 S 2 is still inferior to the Ru/Ir oxides catalysts. Heteroatom doping has been widely used to tune catalytic activity of Ni 3 S 2 . Similarly, nonmetal heteroatom can also engineer geometric and electronic structure and activate surface sites of catalysts. 3 Moreover, as the radius and electronegativity of nonmetal atoms usually differ greatly from that of transition-metal atoms, nonmetal atoms are more likely to bring about changes in the local geometric and electronic structures of active sites of catalysts. This makes nonmetal heteroatoms more attractive in adjusting the electrocatalytic activity of materials. 4 Herein, nonmetal doping would be a more promising way to regulate the electronic structure and OER activity of Ni 3 S 2 . Until now, there are few investigations on modulating the OER activity of Ni 3 S 2 by doping nonmetal-atoms. [Figure] Figure 1. (a) The bond length of X-Ni1 (d X-Ni1 ) corelates with the electronegativity (χx) and atom radius (Rx) of X (the inset shows the top-view of Ni 3 S 2 (100) with labled Ni sites and two doping sites, X out and X in ). (b)The Bader charge of Ni1, Ni2, Ni3 and Ni4 atoms. (c) The correlation between calculated overpotential (η) vs. difference between the adsorption energy of *OH and *O on different sites of all surfaces. (d) The improved active sites proportion (n site ) on X-Ni 3 S 2 (100) and the different between minimum η of each surface and η of Ni 3 S 2 (100). (e) OER polarization curves and (f) experimental overpotential (η) at current density of 10 mA cm -2 , average turnover frequency and exchange current density(J 0 ) of Ni 3 S 2 NSs and C-Ni 3 S 2 NSs. Inspired by the above considerations, we systematically investigated the OER activities of five kinds of nonmetal atoms (X, X = B, C, N, O, P) doped Ni 3 S 2 (X-Ni 3 S 2 ) electrocatalysts and screened out the most promising X-Ni 3 S 2 OER catalysts. The geometric and electronic structure of X-Ni 3 S 2 , intermediates adsorption, potential determining step (PDS), and theoretical overpotentials of OER were studied using the density functional theory (DFT) calculations. With 2.5 at% X doping content, the X-Ni 3 S 2 shows good electronic conductivity which can benefit the charge transfer between the surface and the intermediates during electrocatalysis. Among all X, C and N cause more prominent local structure disturbance on Ni 3 S 2 (100) surface (Fig.1a). This change of local coordination environment furhter disturbe the surface charge distribution, enableing the charge of adjacent Ni sites are intensely altered X (Fig.1b). Further, the OER free energy diagram denonting that the formation of OOH is the the PDS on pristine Ni 3 S 2 (100) and various X-Ni 3 S 2 (100). Among all X dopants, C is most effective dopant which can reduce the OER theorotical overpotential of adjacent Ni sites by 0.16 V and 0.23V when X doping on top most layer (C out -)) and sublayer (Ci n -) of Ni 3 S 2 (100) respectivelly (Fig.1c). Moreover, C doping can effectively active the surface Ni sites and enable the 62.5% of Ni sites on C-Ni 3 S 2 (100) have better OER activity than that of Ni sites on pristine Ni 3 S 2 (Fig.1d).Furthermore, C doped Ni 3 S 2 nanosheets (C-Ni 3 S 2 NSs), and Ni 3 S 2 nanosheets (Ni 3 S 2 NSs) were synthesized through the same method 3 to verify its application in OER. Our electrochemical results verify that C-Ni 3 S 2 NSs catalyst has higher OER activity than pristine Ni 3 S 2 NSs, exhibiting lower overpotential of 261 mV at current density of 10 mA cm -2 (Fig.1e) and lower Tafel slope of 96.18 mV dec -1 compared with Ni 3 S 2 NSs (310 mV, 109.35 mV dec -1 respectively). Besides, C- Ni 3 S 2 NSs has higher exchange current density (J 0 ) and average turnover frequency than pristine Ni 3 S 2 NSs(Fig.1f). Our DFT calculation and experimental results jointly highlight the promising C dopant in promoting the OER performance of Ni 3 S 2 . Our study offers guidance for screening and fabricating promising OER catalysts through nonmetal doping engineering, which can inspire more exploration of nonmetal doping of other electrocatalysts. References Reier, T.; Oezaslan, M.; Strasser, P., ACS Catal. 2012, 2 (8), 1765-1772. Lee, Y.; Suntivich, J.; May, K. J.; Perry, E. E.; Shao-Horn, Y., J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2012, 3 (3), 399-404. Zheng, X.; Zhang, L.; Huang, J.; Peng, L.; Deng, M.; Li, L.; Li, J.; Chen, H.; Wei, Z., J. Phy. Chem. C 2020, 124 (44), 24223-24231. Zheng, X. Q.; Peng, L. S.; Li, L.; Yang, N.; Yang, Y. J.; Li, J.; Wang, J. C.; Wei, Z. D., Chem. Sci. 2018, 9 (7), 1822-1830. Figure 1