Checkpoint inhibitor‐based salvage regimens prior to autologous stem cell transplant improve event‐free survival in relapsed/refractory classic Hodgkin lymphoma

Sanjal H. Desai,Michael A. Spinner,Kevin David,Veronika Bachanova,Gaurav Goyal,Brad Kahl,Kathleen Dorritie,Jacques Azzi,Vaishalee P. Kenkre,Sally Arai,Cheryl Chang,Brendon Fusco,Nuttavut Sumransub,Haris Hatic,Raya Saba,Uroosa Ibrahim,Elyse I. Harris,Harsh Shah,Jacob Murphy,Stephen Ansell,Deepa Jagadish,Victor Orellana‐noia,Catherine Diefenbach,Siddharth Iyenger,K. C. Rappazzo,Rahul Mishra,Yun Choi,Grzegorz S. Nowakowski,Ranjana H. Advani,Ivana N. Micallef
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajh.26827
IF: 13.265
2023-01-13
American Journal of Hematology
Abstract:Clinical trials of novel salvage therapies have encouraging outcomes for relapsed/refractory transplant‐eligible classic Hodgkin lymphoma (R/R cHL) but comparison with conventional chemotherapy is lacking. Herein, we report the final analysis of a multicenter retrospective cohort of R/R cHL assessing outcomes by type of salvage therapy before autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). R/R cHL patients who underwent ASCT at 14 institutions across the United States were included. Outcomes were compared among patients receiving conventional chemotherapy, brentuximab vedotin (BV) + chemotherapy, BV alone, and a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI)‐based regimens before ASCT. Study endpoints included event‐free survival (EFS), progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). All endpoints are defined from relapse. Of 936 patients, 728 received conventional chemotherapy, 73 received BV + chemotherapy, 70 received BV alone, and 65 received CPI‐based regimens prior to ASCT. When adjusted for time to relapse, pre‐ASCT response and use of BV maintenance, patients receiving CPI‐based regimens had superior 2‐year EFS compared to conventional chemotherapy, BV + chemotherapy, and BV alone (79.7, 49.6, 62.3, and 36.9%, respectively, p
hematology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?