Abstract:Considering that both the manufacturer’s production process and the transporter’s freight process produce carbon emissions, this paper constructed a three-echelon supply chain composed of a manufacturer, a transporter, and a retailer. This article studies the cooperative carbon emission reduction among the supply chain members under the carbon cap-and-trade policy and consumer environmental awareness. We used the Stackelberg game to explore four scenarios as follows: (1) in the non-cooperative decision model, no cooperation takes place among all supply chain members; (2) in the local cooperation decision of the manufacturer and the transporter alliance model, the manufacturer and the transporter work together to make decisions reducing carbon emissions, but each member of the supply chain makes its own pricing decisions; (3) in the local cooperation decision of the retailer-transporter alliance model, there is no cooperation except that the retailer and the transporter cooperate with each other to determine the selling price of the product; and (4) in the overall-cooperative decision model, there is complete cooperation among the members of the supply chain, who collectively decide on carbon emission reduction and the selling price of the product. Then, using the backward induction method, we derived and compared the equilibrium solutions and the profits of the supply chain system. The results showed that the scenario of complete cooperation among all supply chain members had the best performance in carbon emission reduction, market equilibrium quantity, and the supply chain system’s profit, but the selling price of the product was likely to be higher than other scenarios. Two contracts have been proposed to coordinate the supply chain system. The cost-sharing contract is effective but imperfect under limited constraints. The two-part tariff contract can realize perfect coordination of the supply chain. Finally, we obtained several interesting conclusions from the numerical example and provide managerial insights and policy implications from the analytical results.

Joint Economic–Environmental Benefit Optimization by Carbon-Abatement Cost Sharing in a Capital-Constrained Green Supply Chain

Joint emission reduction dynamic optimization and coordination in the supply chain considering fairness concern and reference low-carbon effect

Cost-sharing contract in a closed-loop supply chain considering carbon abatement, quality improvement effort, and pricing strategy

Emission reduction cooperation in a dynamic supply chain with competitive retailers

Contracting Emissions Reduction Supply Chain Based on Market Low-Carbon Preference and Carbon Intensity Constraint

Supply chain carbon emission reductions and coordination when consumers have a strong preference for low-carbon products

Research on joint emission reduction in supply chain based on carbon footprint of the product

Contracting emission reduction for supply chains considering market low-carbon preference

Low carbon strategy analysis under revenue-sharing and cost-sharing contracts

Optimal pricing and green decisions in a dual-channel supply chain with cap-and-trade regulation

Research on financing strategy of low-carbon supply chain based on cost-sharing contract

A Green Supply Chain with Sales Effort under a Cost-Sharing Contract

Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract

Differential game analysis of carbon emissions reduction and promotion in a sustainable supply chain considering social preferences

Low carbon strategy analysis with two competing supply chain considering carbon taxation

Pricing decision in an uncertain green product supply chain under cost sharing contract

Joint Decision-Making and the Coordination of a Sustainable Supply Chain in the Context of Carbon Tax Regulation and Fairness Concerns

Carbon emission reduction cooperation of three-echelon supply chain under consumer environmental awareness and cap-and-trade regulation

A Multi-Objective Optimization Model for Green Supply Chain Considering Environmental Benefits

Cost-sharing models for green product production and marketing in a food supply chain

Firms' shareholding behavior in green supply chains: Carbon emissions reduction, power structures, and technology spillovers