Abstract:Purpose This study aims to investigate the relationship between the attributes of corporate boards in UK companies and their tendency to assure their corporate social responsibility (CSR) reports. Design/methodology/approach From the agency theory perspective, the authors examine the impact of board attributes on the assurance of CSR reports for the Financial Times Stock Exchange (FTSE) 350 during 2016–2019. The authors used annual integrated reports, companies’ websites and Thomson Reuters Eikon database for data collection and the logistic regression for data analysis. Findings The results confirm that some board attributes significantly influence a company’s decision to assure its CSR reports. While board size, board tenure, the presence of female board members and female executive directors and Chief Executive Officers (CEOs)’ global working experience positively contribute to CSR assurance (CSRA) decisions, the chairman’s independence negatively contributes to it. However, board independence, board meetings and board financial expertise demonstrate no effect on the CSRA decision. Research limitations/implications The authors focus on some attributes of board members, but the authors did not consider board diversity in its broader meaning. Moreover, the effect of board committees and their attributes on CSRA was not addressed. The authors also did not consider the impact of scope, the quality level of assurance service and the differences between assurance providers on companies’ decisions to neither undertake CSRA nor choose between assurance providers. Practical implications The study provides insights into the increasing demand on voluntary assurance to boost the credibility of CSR reports and the role of the board of directors (BOD) in taking this initiative. The findings highlight the importance of board diversity (e.g. gender) in improving transparency and sustainability reporting, which can help policymakers and regulators in shaping future governance policies. Additionally, the findings refer to a drawback in the UK Corporate Governance Code regarding the chairman’s independence, which requires corrective actions from the Financial Reporting Council. The findings raise concern over the small share of audit firms in the assurance service market, despite the growing demand for these services in the UK, which may require more attention to these services from the audit firms. Social implications Companies are increasingly pressurized, especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, to discharge their accountability to stakeholders and to act in a socially responsible manner in their business activities. CSR reporting is one of the main tools that companies use to communicate their social activities. Understanding the determinants of voluntary CSRA helps to increase the credibility of CSR reports and the favorable response to social pressure. Originality/value The authors add empirical evidence to the limited literature on CSRA about the role of the BOD in undertaking companies’ social responsibility, improving CSR reporting and reducing information asymmetry. It also highlights the significance of maintaining a balanced BOD in terms of gender, experience and tenure, in minimizing the risk of perpetuating non-transparent integrated reporting.

Corporate social responsibility commitment of women directors through audit committees: evidence from international firms

Board Gender Diversity,Managerial Power and Demand for External Audit

An international approach of the relationship between board attributes and the disclosure of corporate social responsibility issues

Female directors on corporate boards and their impact on corporate social responsibility (CSR): evidence from China

Attributes of corporate boards and assurance of corporate social responsibility reporting: evidence from the UK

The moderating role of CSR in board gender diversity and firm financial performance: empirical evidence from an emerging economy

CSR Committees and Their Effect on ESG Performance in UK, France, Germany, and Spain

Women directors, educational background and firm value of Spanish listed companies

Corporate social responsibility reporting and corporate governance mechanisms: An international outlook from emerging countries

Do Board Gender Diversity and Director Typology Impact CSR Reporting?

Does committees' gender diversity affect firms' environmental and social performance?

Does gender diversity moderate the relationship between CSR committees and Sustainable Development Goals disclosure? Evidence from Latin American companies

Female directors and CSR: Does the presence of female directors affect CSR focus?

Audit and CSR committees: are they complements or substitutes in CSR reporting, assurance and GRI framework adoption?

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) PERFORMANCE AND INVESTMENT EFFICIENCY: THE ROLE OF CHARACTERISTIC OF AUDIT COMMITTEE AS MODERATING VARIABLE

Breaking the glass ceiling for a sustainable future: the power of women on corporate boards in reducing ESG controversies

Corporate Governance Configurations and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure: Qualitative Comparative Analysis of Audit Committee and Board characteristics

Corporate social responsibility disclosure and information asymmetry: does boardroom attributes matter?

Ownership structure, stakeholder engagement, and corporate social responsibility policies: The moderating effect of board independence

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND REAL EARNINGS MANAGEMENT: DOES BOARD GENDER DIVERSITY MATTER?

Do All Female Directors Have the Same Impact on Corporate Social Responsibility? the Role of Their Political Connection