You do you: susceptibility of temporal binding to self-relevance

Felicitas V. Muth,Sophia Ebert,Wilfried Kunde

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01906-9

2024-01-04

Psychological Research

Abstract:The self-prioritization effect suggests that self-relevant information has a processing advantage over information that is not directly associated with the self. In consequence, reaction times are faster and accuracy rates higher when reacting to self-associated stimuli rather than to other-related stimuli (Sui et al., Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 38:1105–1117, 2012). This spurs the assumption that self-associated action–effects should also be perceived earlier than other-related outcomes. One way to measure this is temporal binding. Previous research indeed showed that the perceived temporal interval between actions and self-associated outcomes was reduced compared to friend- and other-associated outcomes. However, the employed method (interval estimations) and several experimental design choices make it impossible to discern whether the perceived shortening of the interval between a keypress and a self-relevant outcome is due to a perceptual shift of the action or of the action–effect or both. Thus, we conducted four experiments to assess whether temporal binding can indeed be modulated by self-relevance and if so where this perceptual bias is located. The results did not support stronger temporal binding for self- vs other-related action–effects. We discuss these results against the backdrop of the attentional basis of self-prioritization and propose directions for future research.

psychology, experimental

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is: **Does self-relevance affect the effect of temporal binding**?

Specifically, the researchers aim to experimentally verify whether people perceive a shorter time interval when they perform an action that produces an effect related to themselves compared to when it produces an effect related to others. This phenomenon is known as "temporal binding" or "intentional binding," where people perceive the time interval between a voluntary action and its effect to be shorter than it actually is.

To explore this issue, the researchers designed 4 experiments, primarily using the Libet clock method to measure temporal binding, and evaluated the impact of self-relevance on temporal binding through different conditions (such as self-related shapes, others' shapes, etc.). However, the research results did not support the hypothesis that self-relevance would lead to stronger temporal binding. The researchers discussed these results and proposed directions for future research.