Abstract:Background: Colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) significantly decrease the risk of febrile neutropenia (FN), a common complication of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. Pegfilgrastim (6 mg), introduced in 2002, has a sustained duration of action, with a single dose comparable in efficacy to daily injections of filgrastim (5 g per kg per day) for 10 to 11 days; both agents should be initiated 24 hours after completing chemotherapy. Objectives: To (1) describe the use of pegfilgrastim and filgrastim in oncology practices throughout the United States and (2) compare their effectiveness in actual practice as measured by the outcome of febrile neutropenia in patients who received chemotherapy regimens administered every 3 to 4 weeks for breast, lung, ovarian, colon cancer, or lymphoma and who received a CSF prior to developing FN. Methods: Data were retrospectively obtained from the medical records of a cohort of adult patients aged 18 years or older treated in 99 community oncology practices in the United States in 2001 and 2003. Eligible patients were treated with chemotherapy every 3 to 4 weeks for breast, lung, ovarian, colon cancer, or lymphoma and were users of filgrastim in 2001 (prior to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of pegfilgrastim in January 2002) or users of either filgrastim or pegfilgrastim or both CSF agents in 2003. Results: Pegfilgrastim was initiated, on average, 2.4 days (SD +/-3.2) after chemotherapy in the first cycle of use and 1.9 (+/-3.0) days in subsequent cycles of use. In contrast, filgrastim was started on average 7.7 (+/-6.5) days and 4.9 (4.6) days after chemotherapy in the first and subsequent cycles of use in 2001, increasing to 9.6 (+/-6.2) and 6.4 (+/-6.4) days in 2003. In the first cycle of CSF use, filgrastim was administered for an average of 5.2 (+/-3.5) days to 583 patients in 2001 and 3.7 (+/-2.8) days to 868 patients in 2003 (P <0.001). Among patients who received more than 1 cycle of filgrastim (n = 457 in 2001 and n = 489 in 2003; 78.4% and 56.3% of filgrastim users, respectively), the mean days of filgrastim administered in subsequent cycles was 6.0 (+/-3.5) in 2001 and 4.6 (+/-3.2) in 2003. Pegfilgrastim was administered as a single dose per chemotherapy course to 1,412 patients in 2003. Patients who received pegfilgrastim were more likely to have at least 1 myelosuppressive drug (74.8%) in the regimen compared with patients who received filgrastim in 2003 (70.0%, P = 0.013), but a greater proportion of filgrastim patients in 2003 (19.4%) had advanced-stage disease compared with pegfilgrastim patients (14.8%, P = 0.005). More patients who received filgrastim in 2003 (36.2%) had a cancer other than breast cancer or non-Hodgkin's lymphoma compared with those who received pegfilgrastim (29.5%, P = 0.001). A total of 94 of 1,451 patients (6.5%) who received filgrastim experienced FN compared with 67 of 1,412 patients (4.7%) for pegfilgrastim. The odds ratio of developing FN among patients who received filgrastim versus pegfilgrastim was 1.41 (95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.96; P = 0.040) after adjusting for patient and chemotherapy regimen characteristics. Conclusion: In this retrospective study of patients treated in 99 community oncology practices, patients who received filgrastim often initiated treatment later than recommended and received fewer days per cycle than demonstrated to be effective in randomized controlled trials. Pegfilgrastim was generally initiated earlier within the course of chemotherapy compared with filgrastim, and because of its sustained duration of action, only a single injection was required. In these patients treated with a heterogeneous group of chemotherapy regimens with a broad range of risk of FN, overall, an absolute 1.8% increase in the incidence of developing FN was observed in patients who received filgrastim compared with patients who received pegfilgrastim, (absolute rates of 6.5% and 4.7%, respectively).

Safety of pegfilgrastim in patients with metastatic germ-cell tumor receiving combination chemotherapy containing bleomycin.

Incidence of pulmonary toxicity in bleomycin-containing regimens for testicular cancer with and without the use of growth factor

A Multicenter, Prospective, Non-Interventional Real-World Study to Assess the Effectiveness of Mecapegfilgrastim in Preventing Neutropenia in Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer.

Efficacy and Safety of Mecapegfilgrastim in Preventing Neutropenia During Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy.

White Blood Cell Kinetics in Patients with Gynecologic Cancer Receiving Mecapegfilgrastim Prophylaxis: A Multicenter Real-World Study.

Prophylaxis of Neutropenia with Mecapegfilgrastim in Patients with Hematologic Malignancies

Clinical efficacy and safety of mecapegfilgrastim in small cell lung cancer as primary prophylaxis of neutropenia post chemotherapy: a retrospective analysis

Pooled Analysis on the Effectiveness and Safety of Lipegfilgrastim in Patients With Urological Malignancies in the Real-World Setting

Pegfilgrastim prophylaxis is associated with a lower risk of hospitalization of cancer patients than filgrastim prophylaxis: a retrospective United States claims analysis of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF)

Observational study of the prevalence of febrile neutropenia in patients who received filgrastim or pegfilgrastim associated with 3-4 week chemotherapy regimens in community oncology practices

Efficacy and safety of balugrastim compared with pegfilgrastim in patients with breast cancer receiving chemotherapy

Immunogenicity Assessment of Lipegfilgrastim in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy

Efficacy and Safety of Lipegfilgrastim in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Myelosuppressive Chemotherapy in a Real-World Setting: Results of an Analysis of Pooled Data from Two Non-Interventional European Studies

Pegfilgrastim after High-Dose Chemotherapy and Autologous Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplant: Phase II Study

Chemotherapy-associated treatment burden in breast cancer patients receiving lipegfilgrastim or pegfilgrastim: secondary efficacy data from a phase III study

Pegylated filgrastim is comparable with filgrastim as support for commonly used chemotherapy regimens: a multicenter, randomized, crossover phase 3 study.

Meta-Analysis of Same-Day Pegfilgrastim Administration Stratified by Myelotoxic Febrile Neutropenia Risk and Tumor Type

Efficacy and safety of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim: a randomized, multicenter, active-control phase 3 trial in patients with breast cancer receiving doxorubicin/docetaxel chemotherapy

Incidence of bone pain in patients with breast cancer treated with lipegfilgrastim or pegfilgrastim: an integrated analysis from phase II and III studies

Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Neutropenia with Pegfilgrastim: Pharmacokinetics and Patient Outcomes

Lipegfilgrastim: pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics for body-weight-adjusted and 6 mg fixed doses in two randomized studies in healthy volunteers