What Impacts What: Clinicians' Perspectives of Causality in Aphasia Rehabilitation

Nichol Castro,Sameer A. Ashaie
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2024_ajslp-24-00174
2024-10-09
American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology
Abstract:Purpose: Determining the prognosis of aphasia recovery is an important task for clinicians in the rehabilitation of persons with aphasia. Although there are many variables identified as impactful to aphasia recovery, it is less clear (a) how clinicians perceive causality in aphasia rehabilitation and (b) how prognostic variables interact with each other. This study aimed to understand causal relations between prognostic variables from the clinician perspective. Method: Ratings of perceived causality were obtained from 11 clinicians serving people with aphasia. Participants were presented with 255 directed causal relations (e.g., depression → aphasia severity), representing a total of 18 demographic, diagnostic, and psychosocial variables. Participants rated the perceived causality on a Likert scale from 0 ( no causal effect ) to 10 ( strong causal effect ). We also obtained ratings about frequency of access to information about each of the 18 variables. Results: A perceived causal network showed differences among variables in their perceived causality. There were many causal relations identified, particularly between diagnostic and psychosocial variables. The variables with the strongest perceived causality were predominantly psychosocial variables, including depression, social support, and participation. However, these psychosocial variables were also the variables that clinicians had the least frequent access to information about. There were also notable differences between participants in their perceived causal networks. Conclusions: Clinicians hold valuable information about aphasia rehabilitation, including what variables are important to aphasia recovery. Understanding the complexity of interaction among prognostic variables and obtaining data from clinicians about prognostic variables and causality will advance the rehabilitation of aphasia. Supplemental Material: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.27105865
rehabilitation,audiology & speech-language pathology,linguistics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?