Stepwise Empty Nose Syndrome Evaluation (SENSE) test—A modified cotton test for reduced bias in office diagnosis of empty nose syndrome

Lirit Levi,Angela Yang,Esmond F. Tsai,Yifei Ma,Nour Ibrahim,Sachi S. Dholakia,Vidya K. Rao,Axel Renteria,Xueying Cao,Michael T. Chang,Jayakar V. Nayak

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/alr.23442

2024-10-09

International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology

Abstract:Introduction Diagnosis of empty nose syndrome (ENS) relies on the ENS six‐item questionnaire (ENS6Q) with a score of ≥11, followed by a "positive" cotton test yielding seven‐point reduction from baseline ENS6Q score via cotton placement to the inferior meatus (IM). Given the intricacies of diagnosing ENS and the propensity for false positives with the standard cotton test, we modified the classic single‐step cotton test into a four‐part Stepwise Empty Nose Syndrome Evaluation (SENSE) cotton test to reduce bias and evaluate the placebo effect. Methods Individuals diagnosed with ENS underwent the SENSE test, a single‐blinded, four‐step, office‐based cotton test, without topical anesthesia or decongestants. Conditions included: (1) placebo/no cotton placed; (2) complete cotton‐blockade of nasal vestibule; (3) cotton placed medially against the nasal septum; and (4) cotton placed laterally in the IM (site of inferior turbinate tissue loss). With each condition, patients completed an ENS6Q. Results Forty‐eight ENS patients were included. Twenty‐nine percent demonstrated a placebo effect (p

otorhinolaryngology