Abstract:Embodied cognitive theories predict that linguistic conceptual representations are grounded and continually represented in real world, sensorimotor experiences. However, there is an on-going debate on whether this also holds for abstract concepts. Grammar is the archetype of abstract knowledge, and therefore constitutes a test case against embodied theories of language representation. Former studies have largely focussed on lexical-level embodied representations. In the present study we take the grounding-by-modality idea a step further by using reaction time (RT) data from the linguistic processing of nominal classifiers in Chinese. We take advantage of an independent body of research, which shows that attention in hand space is biased. Specifically, objects near the hand consistently yield shorter RTs as a function of readiness for action on graspable objects within reaching space, and the same biased attention inhibits attentional disengagement. We predicted that this attention bias would equally apply to the graspable object classifier but not to the big object classifier. Chinese speakers (N = 22) judged grammatical congruency of classifier-noun combinations in two conditions: graspable object classifier and big object classifier. We found that RTs for the graspable object classifier were significantly faster in congruent combinations, and significantly slower in incongruent combinations, than the big object classifier. There was no main effect on grammatical violations, but rather an interaction effect of classifier type. Thus, we demonstrate here grammatical category-specific effects pertaining to the semantic content and by extension the visual and tactile modality of acquisition underlying the acquisition of these categories. We conclude that abstract grammatical categories are subjected to the same mechanisms as general cognitive and neurophysiological processes and may therefore be grounded.

Universal Constraints on Linguistic Event Categories: A Cross-Cultural Study of Child Homesign

How Possessive Relations Are Mapped Onto Child Language: A View from Mandarin Chinese.

Downward Entailment in Child Mandarin

Syntactic Cues to the Noun and Verb Distinction in Mandarin Child-Directed Speech

Differences in Scope Assignments for Child and Adult Speakers of Mandarin

Spatial communication systems across languages reflect universal action constraints

How language influences spatial thinking, categorization of motion events, and gaze behavior: a cross-linguistic comparison

An event-semantic account of spatial modification in the acquisition of Mandarin

How Often Do Verbs Co-occur with Relevant Events? Examining Parent and Toddler Speech in Latin America and the US

Social category formation is induced by cues of sharing knowledge in young children

Everyday language input and production in 1,001 children from six continents

English- and Mandarin-learning Infants' Discrimination of Actions and Objects in Dynamic Events.

A Large-Scale Multilingual Study of Visual Constraints on Linguistic Selection of Descriptions

English- and Mandarin-speaking Infants' Discrimination of Persons, Actions, and Objects in a Dynamic Event Without Audio Inputs

Conventionalization Of Linguistic Categories Under Simple Communicative Constraints

Language matters: Thirteen-month-olds understand that the language a speaker uses constrains conventionality.

A cross-cultural study of language and cognition: Numeral classifiers and solid object categorization

The Curious Case of Control

Grounding grammatical categories: attention bias in hand space influences grammatical congruency judgment of Chinese nominal classifiers

A cross-linguistic examination of young children's everyday language experiences

UG-schematic Annotation for Event Nominals: A Case Study in Mandarin Chinese