Monitoring anti-Xa Levels to Optimize Low-Molecular-Weight-Heparin Thromboprophylaxis in High-Risk Hospitalized Patients: A Stratified Meta-Analysis

Sunil John,Molly Wilkinson,Kwok M. Ho
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00033197221150673
2023-01-08
Angiology
Abstract:Angiology, Ahead of Print. It is uncertain whether monitoring or targeting anti-Xa levels is necessary when using low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH) to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE). This stratified meta-analysis assessed whether monitoring trough or peak anti-Xa levels with LMWH dosing would reduce risk of VTE. Twelve non-randomized studies involving 3604 hospitalized patients met the inclusion criteria and were subject to meta-analysis. Eight studies assessed the association between VTE and peak anti-Xa levels (between .2 and .5 IU/ml) and four studies assessed the benefits of targeting the trough anti-Xa levels (>.1 IU/ml). Achieving an adequate peak or trough anti-Xa level was associated with a reduced risk of VTE (random-effects model odds ratio [OR] .52, 95% confidence interval [CI] .34-.77; P = .001, I2 = 30% and P-value for heterogeneity = .171) compared with using a fixed standard dose of LMWH. Targeting the trough level (OR .40, 95%CI 0.22–.75, P = .004) appeared to be more effective than targeting the peak level (OR .62, 95%CI 0.37–1.03, P = .066), although a formal interaction analysis did not confirm they were statistically different (ratio of ORs = 1.52, 95%CI 0.68–3.40; z score = 1.03, P = .306). Targeting a higher anti-Xa level did not appear to increase the risk of bleeding or transfusion (OR 1.20, 95%CI 0.46–3.17, P = .707).
peripheral vascular disease
What problem does this paper attempt to address?