Systematic review of the significance of neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in anastomotic leak after gastrointestinal surgeries

Sarvin Es Haghi,Monireh Khanzadeh,Shirin Sarejloo,Fariba Mirakhori,Jairo Hernandez,Emma Dioso,Michael Goutnik,Brandon Lucke-Wold,Arshin Ghaedi,Shokoufeh Khanzadeh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12893-023-02292-0

2024-01-08

BMC Surgery

Abstract:The inflammatory response is thought to be a critical initiator of epigenetic alterations. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), a biomarker of inflammation, is computed by dividing the number of neutrophils by the number of lymphocytes. The primary goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the pre-operative NLR of gastrointestinal surgery patients who had an anastomotic leak (AL) in comparison to those who did not AL.

surgery

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem this paper attempts to address is the evaluation of the significance of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with anastomotic leakage (AL) after gastrointestinal surgery. Specifically, the study aims to compare the preoperative NLR levels of patients who developed AL with those who did not, to explore whether NLR can serve as a biomarker for predicting AL.

### Research Background
The inflammatory response is considered an important initiator of epigenetic changes. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an inflammatory marker calculated by dividing the number of neutrophils by the number of lymphocytes. Recent studies have shown that NLR predicts patient survival more accurately than neutrophil or lymphocyte counts alone. Additionally, some studies suggest that NLR has potential predictive value for anastomotic leakage (AL) after gastrointestinal surgery. AL is a serious postoperative complication that leads to significant morbidity and mortality, making the search for effective predictive markers crucial for improving patient outcomes.

### Research Objective
The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate whether there is a significant difference in preoperative NLR levels between patients who develop AL and those who do not in gastrointestinal surgery patients. Through this study, the authors hope to determine whether NLR can serve as an effective biomarker for predicting AL and provide a basis for clinical decision-making.

### Main Findings
- **Overall Results**: The study found that patients who developed AL had significantly higher preoperative NLR levels compared to those who did not (random effects model: SMD = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.11–1.38, p = 0.02).
- **Subgroup Analysis**:
- **Retrospective Studies**: In retrospective studies, patients who developed AL had significantly higher NLR levels compared to the control group (SMD = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.20–1.66, p = 0.01).
- **Prospective Studies**: In prospective studies, there was no significant difference in NLR levels (SMD = −0.11, 95% CI = −0.65–0.43, p = 0.69).
- **Ethnicity Analysis**: Among Caucasian patients, those who developed AL had significantly higher NLR levels compared to the control group (SMD = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.01–2.68, p = 0.04), whereas this difference was not significant among East Asian patients (SMD = 0.14, 95% CI = −0.13–0.41, p = 0.29).

### Conclusion
The study results suggest a potential association between preoperative NLR levels and anastomotic leakage after gastrointestinal surgery. However, this association shows significant differences across different study designs and ethnicities, particularly more pronounced in retrospective studies and among Caucasian patients. Larger and more diverse cohort studies are needed in the future to validate these findings and explore the potential factors leading to the observed differences.