Abstract:<p>Predicting phase diagrams from first principle calculations eliminates the need of tedious experimental trials and errors. Fully automating first principle phase diagram calculations without any sort of human intervention has been a long daunting task and troubling scientific communities for decades. This grand problem remains not fully resolved, largely due to the vastly high-dimensional parameter space associated with density functional theory, cluster expansion, lattice Monte Carlo, and the substantial uncertainty propagating through a set of complex simulations. As a first step to tackle this grand problem, we reported a first demonstration of how sensitive phase boundary locations can be to various cluster expansion fittings and input DFT training data. To the best knowledge of the authors, this study reported the first ever attempt to quantify uncertainty in first principles statistical mechanics framework. In addition, a semi-automated phase transition detection algorithm has been devised in this paper to deal with the associated statistical errors and uncertainties from Monte Carlo method and its predecessor DFT calculations and cluster expansions. This algorithm has been applied in a classical cluster expansion Mg-Cd binary alloy system to detect phase transitions at various locations of phase diagram using different cluster expansions to demonstrate its predictive power and quantify uncertainties. The results suggested that using Chebyshev basis function shifted the transition locations toward the dilute solid solution phase and expanded the phase stability of concentrated ordered phases to wider composition range. The addition of perturbed defect configurations into training data set lowered the order-disorder transition temperature to be away from true transition temperature, suggesting the transition nature is indeed configurational disorder dominated rather than defect assisted. We found that the weighting has negligible effect on the transition locations, except for the case of using Chebyshev basis function to fit all non-weighted configurations that can be susceptible to Monte Carlo sampling hysteresis.</p>

Uncertainty quantification of phase boundary in a composition-phase map via Bayesian strategies

Estimating the temperature dependent zero-phase-fraction features in ternary phase diagram via Bayesian approach

Quantified uncertainty in thermodynamic modeling for materials design

Bayesian inference of composition-dependent phase diagrams

Efficient Thermodynamic Model Optimization and Uncertainty Quantification Via Integration of Combinatorial Materials Chip and Bayesian Approach

Effects of cluster expansion on the locations of phase transition boundary as a first step to quantify uncertainty in first principles statistical mechanics framework

Efficient thermodynamic modelling with uncertainty quantification of the Ag–Cu–Co system from its sub-binary systems

Uncertainty Quantification of Phase Transition Problems with an Injection Boundary

Machine learning assisted predictions of multi-component phase diagrams and fine boundary information

Machine-Learning-Based phase diagram construction for high-throughput batch experiments

Accelerating Multicomponent Phase-Coexistence Calculations with Physics-informed Neural Networks

Accurate simulation estimates of phase behaviour in ternary mixtures with prescribed composition

Calculation of phase diagrams in the multithermal-multibaric ensemble

Thermodynamic Modeling of the U-Nb-Zr Ternary System

Unified Approach for Cluster Variation Method Calculations of Phase Diagrams in Fcc Substitutional Alloys with Interstitial Species

Determining Multi‐Component Phase Diagrams with Desired Characteristics Using Active Learning

Bayesian strategies for uncertainty quantification of the thermodynamic properties of materials

An Incremental Phase Mapping Approach for X-ray Diffraction Patterns using Binary Peak Representations

A simple and accurate method to determine fluid-crystal phase boundaries from direct coexistence simulations

The geometry of high-dimensional phase diagrams: II. The duality between closed and open chemical systems

The geometry of high-dimensional phase diagrams: III. Engineering relative stability in four dimensions