Assessment of Pollution Status in Surajpur Wetland using multivariate statistical analysis, Uttar Pradesh, India
Rajora, Koshal
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-024-11622-1
IF: 2.8
2024-06-03
Environmental Earth Sciences
Abstract:The seasonal water quality of the Surajpur wetland was analysed using 13 physicochemical parameters, including pH, TDS, EC, temperature, total hardness, total alkalinity, DO, BOD, phosphate, fluoride, nitrate, sulphate, and chloride employing standardized procedures. Fifteen samples were collected in triplicate from five distinct locations within the wetland. These samples were then compared to the BIS and WHO standards (2012). The analysis used titrimetric techniques to determine DO, BOD, total hardness, total alkalinity, and chlorides. Moreover, phosphate, sulphate, and nitrate were determined through UV-spectrophotometry. The wetland has an alkaline nature, the hydrogeochemical facies that dominate the surface water are Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , HCO 3 , and Cl − . The results indicate that TDS, total alkalinity, phosphates, and fluorides exceeded the permissible limits. The evaluation of water quality in the study area was conducted through the implementation of the standard Water Quality Index (WQI), the Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment Water Quality Index-(CCME-WQI) and the Comprehensive Pollution Index (CPI) and their associated parameters.. The CCME-WQI ranges from 46 to 53, indicating very poor/marginal water quality, the WQI value ranges from 82.80 to 96.18, indicating good water quality, while the CPI ranges from 0.9 to 1.15, indicating very poor/marginal water quality. The pH-EC and pH-TA, TDS-CPI, Cl-TH and the WQI-PO 4 3− are negatively correlated at a significance level p < 0.01. The TA-EC, BOD-DO and TA-PO 4 3− are negatively correlated at a significance level p < 0.05 as per the correlation matrix result. Using hierarchical cluster analysis, 5 sampling sites were divided into two clusters based on the similarity of water quality characteristics: comparatively less polluted and more polluted sites. The four principal components were identified using PCA, principal components contribute to 46.02%, 223.48%, 19.38% and 11.11%, of the total variance of the dataset respectively. The PCA indicate that the variation in water quality is due to anthropogenic activities around the vicinity of the wetland. In order to preserve the wetland's aesthetic value and ecological health, preventive measures such as de-weeding, preventing the infiltration of untreated sewage, and desilting are advised. Incorporating these measures can prevent potential damage to the wetland and ensure the survival of its ecology and aesthetic value.
environmental sciences,water resources,geosciences, multidisciplinary