Abstract:This paper analyzes the origins, persistence, and current evolution of a series of non-legal rules (or "norms") that have played an important role in Japanese corporate governance. The four central features of the governance environment examined here include: 1) the main bank system, in which banks voluntarily restructure loans to some distressed borrowers, 2) a social distaste for hostile takeovers, 3) implicit promises of employment stability, and 4) belief systems about the proper role and structure of the board of directors. I show that, despite virtually ubiquitous claims to the contrary, these norms do not enjoy a long history of practice in Japan, but rather emerged only in the immediate postwar period. I hypothesize that they emerged for two reasons: First, they served as a low-cost substitute for a troubled formal institutional environment beset by the "transplant effect" that imperils legal reform in transition economies today. Second, they provided private benefits to the small number of interest groups that emerged intact from World War II. The flow of private benefits to norm adherents explains the persistence of the norms despite clear evidence of their inefficiency over the past decade. I demonstrate that current models of norm reform, which emphasize the role of exogenous shocks, the workings of norm entrepreneurs, and increased information, explain why the norms of Japanese corporate governance are currently evolving. Finally, extrapolating from Japan's experience, I suggest how norm analysis can contribute to the two most pressing questions in comparative corporate governance today: whether law matters to corporate governance, and whether diverse systems of corporate governance are converging toward the Anglo-American model. As to both questions, I suggest that closer attention to norms reveals shortcomings in the existing literature.

Corporate governance reform, and ownership, and control: perspective from Japan

Ownership Structure,Resolution Mechanism and Control Right of Listed Companies

Corporate ownership structure and risk-taking: evidence from Japan

Ownership structure, corporate governance, and assurance in sustainability reporting: evidence from Japan

Reforms of corporate governance in East Asia: December 2022

The Executive Officer System in Corporate Governance in Japan

Institutional ownership, cross‐shareholdings and corporate cash reserves in Japan

Corporate governance and risk-taking: Evidence from Japanese firms

Corporate governance and national culture: a multi‐country study

Creative Norm Destruction: The Evolution of Nonlegal Rules in Japanese Corporate Governance

Surveying the Reform of Japanese Accounting System: A Perspective from Corporate Governance

Corporate governance, top executive compensation and firm performance in Japan

How Do Various Forms of Ownership Impact Firm Performance?

Corporate Governance Reform and State Ownership: Evidence from China

The Multifaceted Ownership Change of Foreign Subsidiaries: the Diverse Responses to Different Types of Negative Performance Feedback

Independent Directors and Team Production in Japanese Corporate Governance

Ownership Structure, Differences in Environment and Development of Corporate Governance Style

SOE Reform:A Deepening Study Based on Connotational Function of Management and Governance

Institutional ownership and corporate risk-taking in Japanese listed firms

The Importance of Corporate Governance of Banks Concerning the Ownership in the International Environment