[Is there a 'female version' of perversion?]

K M Beier
Abstract:There have been no convincing ideas to date explaining the far less frequent occurrence of perverse symptom formation in females compared to males. Hypothesis: Unlike the intrapsychic mechanisms for self-esteem regulation in males as a basic component of perversion--extraphysical (compensational) culminating in an output of sexual impulses--a functional stabilisation of the female self concept seems more likely, if conflict drives were to be focussed on reproductive aspects and not on sexuality. It therefore seems--in linguistic analogy to perversion--more suitable to use a new expression: "reproversion". In addition to a theoretical explanation of the "reproversion" concept and one case history, a general survey describes the various clinical manifestations covering intensity, the egoproximity within the personality structure, the expressed form and meaning of the "reproverse" symptom formation as well as giving a view of the underlying personality disturbances. Finally, some theoretical reflections on ideological aspects point out the diverse judgement of perversion and "reproversion" in society today.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?