Abstract:Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has created challenges in the diagnosis and management of colorectal cancer (CRC). It was proposed in regional Northern Australia that the distance to services could further impact cancer outcomes, leading to delayed diagnosis. The authors compared the outcomes of patients prior and during the pandemic; with a focus on whether patients were presenting in the emergency setting with more advanced disease. The distance to treatment was also analysed to see if there was any impact to the management of patients with colorectal cancer. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 444 patients who underwent treatment for colorectal cancer over two time periods was examined. Time period 1 (prior to COVID-19); March 2017-July 2019 and time period 2 (during COVID-19); March 2020-July 2022. Only patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma were included if they were primarily treated at a hospital in northern Australia; those with benign pathologies or recurrent disease were also excluded. Data was collected in terms of treatment and outcomes and compared between the two groups. A separate analysis of whether locality affected outcomes and referral times was also performed. Results: In the time period prior to COVID-19, 174 patients' required invasive management, while in the second time period during COVID-19, there were 188 patients managed surgically or endoscopically. Of the patients managed prior to COVID-19 17/174 (9.8%) patients required emergency interventions, during COVID-19 this number increased to 37/188 (19.7%). This difference was deemed to be statistically significant (P =0.008). No substantial difference in cancer staging at presentation was found between the two groups. There was an increase in complication rate found during COVID-19 34.6 vs 25.5% prior to COVID-19 (P=0.046). During COVID-19, the median time between General Practitioner (primary care physician) referral and colonoscopy was actually lower than prior to covid 26.5 vs 36 days (P=0.047). When comparing local to distant patients, we found locally based patients had lower rates of neoadjuvant treatment 18.9 vs 30.4% (P=0.018) and higher rates of open surgery 39.1 vs 26.5%, P =0.012. An increase in time between colonoscopy and outpatient department review (OPD) was seen in patients not from the local area 13 vs 18 days (P =0.006). Conclusion: The authors found during the COVID-19 pandemic a greater proportion of patients were presenting with colorectal cancer that required emergency intervention. This may be due to decreased presentations to general practitioners due to lockdown causing potential delays in diagnosis. The authors did not see more advanced disease in these patients presenting emergently, between the two groups. Further assessment of local patients' vs patients from distant sites, showed difference in how patients were managed but similar outcomes. Our large catchment area with distance to treatment in Northern Australia may further impact the management of colorectal cancer in the future.

The impact of economic crisis, COVID‐19, and the Beirut Blast on colorectal cancer patients in Lebanon: A trend to operate more late‐stage complex cases

IMPACT OF THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC ON THE EMERGENCY SURGICAL TREATMENT OF COLORECTAL CANCER

Unveiling the Hidden Consequences: The Initial Impact of COVID-19 on Colorectal Cancer Operation

COVID‐19 and the emergency presentation of colorectal cancer

Clinical outcomes of obstructive colorectal cancer patients during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic

Epidemiology and Survival of Colorectal Cancer in Lebanon: A Sub-National Retrospective Analysis

Influence of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Patients with Rectal Cancer

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Clinical and Pathologic Characteristics of Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Multicenter Study in South Korea

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on colorectal cancer stage at presentation.

Colorectal cancer treatment outcomes during the pandemic: Our experience of COVID‐19 at a tertiary referral center

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: a Systematic Review

Global impact of COVID-19 on surgeons and team members (GlobalCOST): a cross-sectional study

Melbourne colorectal collaboration: a multicentre review of the impact of COVID-19 on colorectal cancer in Melbourne, Australia

The consequences of the Covid-19 pandemic on elective surgery for colon cancer

Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the providers of oncological abdominal surgery services– a scoping review

[Évaluation de la gravité du cancer colorectal dépisté dans le contexte de la crise sanitaire liée au COVID19 en région Ile-de-France]

Colorectal surgery during the COVID-19 outbreak: do we need to change?

The impact of COVID-19 on colorectal cancer in regional Northern Australia and changes to treatment related to distance to care: a retrospective cohort study

Impact of the economic crisis, COVID-19 and the Beirut explosion on ophthalmology training in Lebanon: an observational cohort survey-based study

Evidence-Based Strategies for the Treatment of Peritoneal Malignancies during Health Care Resource Restriction: The COVID-19 Pandemic

[Severe cholecystitis during the COVID-19 pandemic : Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the frequency of surgery and outcome for elective and emergency cholecystectomy: a monocentric retrospective cohort analysis]