Abstract:Network communities are a fundamental characteristic of human brain's circuit organization. Community detection methods are differentially sensitive to the connectome topology and can yield highly dissimilar estimates, especially in underdeveloped brains, leading to method‐dependent mappings to cognitive and other parameters. A probabilistic approach may be more robust than modularity‐maximization and geometric methods. Community structure is a fundamental topological characteristic of optimally organized brain networks. Currently, there is no clear standard or systematic approach for selecting the most appropriate community detection method. Furthermore, the impact of method choice on the accuracy and robustness of estimated communities (and network modularity), as well as method‐dependent relationships between network communities and cognitive and other individual measures, are not well understood. This study analyzed large datasets of real brain networks (estimated from resting‐state fMRI from n = 5251 pre/early adolescents in the adolescent brain cognitive development [ABCD] study), and n = 5338 synthetic networks with heterogeneous, data‐inspired topologies, with the goal to investigate and compare three classes of community detection methods: (i) modularity maximization‐based (Newman and Louvain), (ii) probabilistic (Bayesian inference within the framework of stochastic block modeling (SBM)), and (iii) geometric (based on graph Ricci flow). Extensive comparisons between methods and their individual accuracy (relative to the ground truth in synthetic networks), and reliability (when applied to multiple fMRI runs from the same brains) suggest that the underlying brain network topology plays a critical role in the accuracy, reliability and agreement of community detection methods. Consistent method (dis)similarities, and their correlations with topological properties, were estimated across fMRI runs. Based on synthetic graphs, most methods performed similarly and had comparable high accuracy only in some topological regimes, specifically those corresponding to developed connectomes with at least quasi‐optimal community organization. In contrast, in densely and/or weakly connected networks with difficult to detect communities, the methods yielded highly dissimilar results, with Bayesian inference within SBM having significantly higher accuracy compared to all others. Associations between method‐specific modularity and demographic, anthropometric, physiological and cognitive parameters showed mostly method invariance but some method dependence as well. Although method sensitivity to different levels of community structure may in part explain method‐dependent associations between modularity estimates and parameters of interest, method dependence also highlights potential issues of reliability and reproducibility. These findings suggest that a probabilistic approach, such as Bayesian inference in the framework of SBM, may provide consistently reliable estimates of community structure across network topologies. In addition, to maximize robustness of biological inferences, identified network communities and their cognitive, behavioral and other correlates should be confirmed with multiple reliable detection methods.

Investigating cognitive neuroscience theories of human intelligence: A connectome‐based predictive modeling approach

Choosing explanation over performance: Insights from machine learning-based prediction of human intelligence from brain connectivity

EEG connectome-based predictive modeling of nonverbal intelligence level in healthy subjects

Investigating robust associations between functional connectivity based on graph theory and general intelligence

A deep learning based approach identifies regions more relevant than resting‐state networks to the prediction of general intelligence from resting‐state fMRI

Predicting an individual’s functional connectivity from their structural connectome: Evaluation of evidence, recommendations and future prospects

Integrating across neuroimaging modalities boosts prediction accuracy of cognitive ability

Prediction of individual performance and verbal intelligence scores from resting‐state fMRI in children and adolescents

Analysis of the human connectome data supports the notion of a "Common Model of Cognition" for human and human-like intelligence across domains

Network modeling of dynamic brain interactions predicts emergence of neural information that supports human cognitive behavior

Structure can predict function in the human brain: a graph neural network deep learning model of functional connectivity and centrality based on structural connectivity

Data-driven brain network models predict individual variability in behavior

Individual cognitive traits can be predicted from task-based dynamic functional connectivity with a deep convolutional-recurrent model

Examining the neurostructural architecture of intelligence: The Lothian Birth Cohort 1936 study

What do neuroanatomical networks reveal about the ontology of human cognitive abilities?

Community detection in the human connectome: Method types, differences and their impact on inference

Genetic and Environmental Contributions to Functional Connectivity Architecture of the Human Brain

The relationship between spatial configuration and functional connectivity of brain regions

Understanding the link between functional profiles and intelligence through dimensionality reduction and graph analysis

Individual brain activity patterns during task are predicted by distinct resting-state networks that may reflect local neurobiological features

Methodological evaluation of individual cognitive prediction based on the brain white matter structural connectome