Abstract 13906: Excess Epicardial Fat Volume is a Novel Risk Marker for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment, Beyond Coronary Artery Calcium Score

Mahfouz El Shahawy,Katelyn Schultz,Sukanya Mohan,Antonella Sabatini,Genevieve Palmer,Mahfouz El ShahawyKatelyn SchultzSukanya MohanAntonella SabatiniGenevieve PalmerCardiovascular Cntr Sarasota,Sarasota,FLMedicine,Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine,Bradenton,FLASC - Antonella Sabatini Cardiology,Florence,ItalyMedicine,Lake Erie College of Osteopathic Medicine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.13906

IF: 37.8

2021-11-10

Circulation

Abstract:Introduction: Excess epicardial fat volume (EFV) is reported to be associated with cardiovascular structural and functional abnormalities. Hypothesis: The purpose of this study is to assess whether excess EFV is associated with structural and functional changes, regardless of coronary artery calcium score (CACS). Methods: 2,892 untreated and asymptomatic subjects were screened for cardiovascular risk using the Early Cardiovascular Health Risk Scoring System (ECVHRS). The ECVHRS consists of 10 tests; 7 of which are vascular, and 3 are cardiac. The vascular tests are as follows: large (C1) and small (C2) artery stiffness, blood pressure (BP) at rest and post-mild exercise protocol (PME), carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), abdominal aorta ultrasound, retinal photography, and microalbuminuria. The mild exercise protocol involves a 3-minute walk on a treadmill at 7% elevation and a speed of 2.5 miles per hour. The BP was measured at rest and immediately after completion of the 3-minute walk. An abnormal rise in BP-PME is defined as a systolic BP rise of ≥ 30 mmHg, a systolic BP ≥ 170 mmHg, or a diastolic BP ≥ 90 mmHg. The 3 cardiac tests are as follows: pro-BNP, electrocardiogram (ECG), and left ventricle ultrasound (LVUS). The ECG and LVUS were individually interpreted for abnormalities. Out of these 2,892 subjects, 328 were evaluated for CACS and EFV using a cardiac CT scan. Results: As seen in the table below, the subjects in Group 1 (n=35), with an excess amount of epicardial fat (EFV ≥ 94 cm 3 ) averaging 151.63 cm 3 , were associated with statistically significant structural and functional abnormalities, as compared with Group 2 (n=22), with a normal average EFV of 70.77 cm 3 . Conclusions: Based on our data, we posit that it is time to think beyond CACS as the mainstay determining factor for CVD risk. In our study population, EFV has a greater influence and correlation with cardiac structural and functional abnormalities. Time to focus on assessing EFV on cardiac CT scan.

cardiac & cardiovascular systems,peripheral vascular disease