Abstract:Abstract Background Despite the advance in neoadjuvant chemothepray/chemoradiotherapy and favourable outcomes of surgical management in supraclavicular lymph node (SCLN) involvement reported in recent studies, the latest AJCC/UICC TMN classification still regards SCLN metastasis as extra-regional i.e Stage IVB (M1) disease. The role of SCLN dissection and surgical management remain controversial. At National University Hospital of the present study, bilateral supraclavicular lymphadenectomy is routinely performed for resectable thoracic ESCC. The aim of this retrospective cohort study is to investigate the long-term outcome of surgical management in pathological SCLN metastasis and its survival benefit comparing to Stage IIB-IVA diseases. Methods Patients with ESCC who underwent esophagectomy and 3-field lymphadenectomy with curative intent between January 2013 and January 2023 at the single centre were included; cases of salvage esophagectomy post-definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy, palliative resections, and concurrent head and neck cancers were excluded. Neoadjuvant treatments were considered in cases staged clinically as T2 and/or N1 or greater. Pathological status of lymph nodes was recorded according to JES classification. Demographics and prognostic factors were examined using univariant analysis of overall survival (OS). Patients with SCLN metastases and other LN involvements were compared and OS were analysed using Kaplan-Meier method. Results 544 patients were included. 183 had one or more pathological LN metastasis (pN1:126, pN2 46, and PN3: 11) in which 55 patients had SCLN metastasis. Patients with LN metastasis had poorer prognosis than those without (pN0) with a Hazard Ratio (HR) of 2.68 (95% CI, 1.12-3.40, p<0.01); similar pattern was seen in patients with SCLN metastasis (HR 2.28, p<0.01). The 3-year and 5-year OS of patients with SCLN metastasis was 18.5% and 11.6% respectively whereas those of other LN metastasis was 21.4% and 15.8%; the difference between the groups was not statistically significant (p=0.525) (graph 1). Conclusion Lymph node status (pN) is a well-recognised prognostic factor as reaffirmed, however, within the pN positive cohort, long-term survival of patients with SCLN metastasis, considered as stage IVB (M1), was comparable (p<0.05) to those with other LN metastases. This supports the survival benefit of surgical resection with neoadjuvant therapy in SCLN metastases as following nodal disease treatment algorithm; further evaluation including systemic therapy and lymph node sub-group analysis is being conducted. Whilst randomised controlled trials such as Japanese JCOG2013 provides level I evidence, the present study provides complementary real-world experience for SCLN dissection.

Practice patterns for positive sentinel lymph node in head and neck melanoma

The Role of Completion Lymph Node Dissection for Sentinel Lymph Node-Positive Melanoma

Omission of Completion Lymph Node Dissection in Sentinel Node Biopsy Positive Head and Neck Cutaneous Melanoma Patients

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy and Management of Regional Lymph Nodes in Melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update

Complete lymph node dissection in cutaneous melanoma patients with positive sentinel lymph node: Outcome and predictors in a retrospective cohort study over 16 years

Completion Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Sentinel Lymph Node Positive Cutaneous Head and Neck Melanoma.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Melanoma: American Society of Clinical Oncology and Society of Surgical Oncology Joint Clinical Practice Guideline

Assessment of Complete Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with Melanoma: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Lymphadenectomy After Melanoma—A National Analysis of Recurrence Rates and Risk of Lymphedema

The Prognostic Significance of Non‐sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Cutaneous and Acral Melanoma Patients—a Multicenter Retrospective Study

False-negative sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma: a single-surgeon experience

555. SUPRACLAVICULAR NODE INVOLVEMENT, A NODAL OR METASTATIC DISEASE? - A 10-YEAR EXPERIENCE IN ESOPHAGEAL CARCINOMA AT A TERTIARY REFERRAL CENTRE

Assessment and Treatment Strategies for Occult Contralateral Lymph Node Metastasis in Hypopharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients with Ipsilateral Node-Positive Necks

Complications following completion lymphadenectomy versus therapeutic lymphadenectomy for melanoma - A systematic review of the literature

Nodal Metastases in Stage 3 Head and Neck Melanoma: Patterns of Metastases and Patterns of Failure

Sentinel Node Biopsy or Neck Dissection for Early-Stage Oral Cancer For Long Term Follow-Up: Matched-Pair Analysis for pN0 Necks

Selective Sentinel Node Dissection in Melanoma with Trends and Future Directions

Sentinel lymph node biopsy in high‐risk cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Systematic review and meta‐analysis

Investigation of Prognostic Factors for Non-Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients Undergoing Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy for Cutaneous Malignant Melanoma: Experience from a Reference Center in Turkey

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head Neck Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Patients