Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability and the validity of a Chinese version of the SF-36 scales.METHODS:A multi-stage mixed sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of the general population. The sample size was 1 000 households. All family members of a selected household, aged 18 and older, completed a survey by self-administration. Formal psychometric methods for testing assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction were used according to the standard procedure of the IQOLA Project.RESULTS:Of the 1 985 collected questionnaires, 1 972 were qualified. Of them, 1 688 (85.6%) were respondents. 1 316 respondents answered all 36 items, while the remaining (372 respondents) answered with one or several missing responses. Among the non-respondents, 65.5% were illiteracy or quasi-illiteracy. The assumption of equal intervals was violated for the VT and MH scales. The recoded item values were used to calculate scale scores. The clustering and ordering of the item means were approximately the same as that of the source version and other two Chinese versions. The items in each scale had similar standard deviations except those in the PF, BP, SF scales. The correlations between an item and its hypothesized scale were identical for all except the SF and VT scales. The scaling success rates of convergent validity were 0% for the SF scale, 75% for the VT scale, and 100% for the other six scales. The scaling success rates of discriminat validity ranged from 87.5% to 100% for all scales except for the SF scale. The Cronbach' alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.88, which were satisfactory for group comparison except 0.39 for the SF scale and 0.66 for the VT scale. The two-weeks test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.94. Factor analysis identified two principal components: a "physical" factor and a "mental" factor. Taken together, these two factors could be used to explain 56.3% of the total variance.CONCLUSION:The Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scale has achieved conceptual equivalence and satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in China. Known-groups validity will give more meaningful evidences of the validity of the Chinese SF-36 scales.

Japanese version of the Brief Sense of Community Scale: construct validity and reliability

A Preliminary Study on Self-constructionals Scales (scs)of Chinese-Version

Verification of a Sense of Community Scale for Hospitals in Japan

Development and validation of the Japanese version of the Auckland individualism and collectivism scale: relationship between individualism/collectivism and mental health

Reliability and Validity of a Japanese Version of the Short-Form Eysenck Personality Questionnaire—Revised

Development of Older Adults' Perceptions on Community‐based Connectedness with People Scale: Reliability and validity evaluation

Psychometric Validation of the Compassion Scale in Japan (CS-J)

[Development and evaluation of reliability and validity of Japanese version of Positive Solitude Scale]

Reliability and Vaiidatioa of the Social Comparison Orientation Scale

Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the 12-Item Psychosocial Safety Climate Scale (PSC-12J)

Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the psychological safety scale for workers

A validation of the Japanese adaptation of the Big Five Inventory-2

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the TaijinKyofusho(TKS) Scale

Japanese Translation of the Concerns of Social Reprisal Scale and Examination of the Bivalent Fear of Evaluation Model for Social Anxiety in Japan

Validation of the Personal Need for Structure Scale in Chinese.

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

The Revision of the Personal Need for Structure Scale in Chinese

[Development and validation of a sympathy scale].

Measuring general sense of agency: a Japanese adaptation and validation of the sense of agency scale (J-SoAS)

Developing and Validating Japanese Versions of Psychological Safety Scale, Knowledge Sharing Scale and Expressed Humility Scale