The beneficial effect of sleep on behavioral health problems in youth is disrupted by prenatal cannabis exposure: A causal random forest analysis of ABCD data.

Spechler,P. A.,Gutierrez,R. M.,Tapert,S. F.,Thompson,W. K.,Paulus,M. P.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.05.12.22275012
2022-05-14
MedRxiv
Abstract:Importance: Declining risk perceptions and touted medicinal claims about cannabis are likely related to the increasing prevalence of cannabis use during pregnancy. Yet, it remains unclear if prenatal cannabis exposure yields lasting neurodevelopmental alterations in children, and which facets of their behavioral health might be affected. Objective: To determine if prenatal cannabis exposure moderates the relationship between changing sleep hours on changing mood and behavioral problems in youth. Design: Causal random forest analysis of ABCD cohort data using baseline (ages 9-10) and year-1 follow up information. Setting: 11,875 children and their parents were assessed at 21 acquisition sites across the United States between July 2016 to October 2018. Participants: Participants with prenatal drug use data were included, and 94% of the baseline sample also had year-1 follow up data. Exposures: A change in sleep hours from baseline to year-1 was conceptualized as the dimensional treatment variable, and self-reported drug uses of the biological mother were conceptualized as moderators of that treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: A change in internalizing (anxious/depressed mood) and externalizing (disruptive behavior) problems from baseline to year-1 were the two outcome measures. Sociodemographic and other prenatal drug exposures were included as covariates. Given the observational nature of the multi-site ABCD study, all hypotheses tested here were formulated after data collection. Results: There were n=9,826 children (4,663 female) included in analyses, of which n=605 (303 female) had any prenatal cannabis exposure. On average, internalizing problems largely remained stable from baseline (M=48.54, SD=10.56) to year-1 (M=48.75, SD=10.64)(t9,825=2.40, p=.016), as did externalizing problems (baseline M=45.64, SD=10.21; year-1 M=45.23, SD=10.09) (t9,825=5.44, p
What problem does this paper attempt to address?