Abstract:Climate change and energy security concerns have driven the development of policies that encourage bioenergy production. Meeting EU targets for the consumption of transport fuels from bioenergy by 2020 will require a large increase in the production of bioenergy feedstock. Initially an increase in 'first generation' biofuels was observed, however 'food competition' concerns have generated interest in second generation biofuels (SGBs). These SGBs can be produced from co-products (e.g. cereal straw) or energy crops (e.g. miscanthus), with the former largely negating food competition concerns. In order to assess the sustainability of feedstock supply for SGBs, the financial, environmental and energy costs and benefits of the farm system must be quantified. Previous research has captured financial costs and benefits through linear programming (LP) approaches, whilst environmental and energy metrics have been largely been undertaken within life cycle analysis (LCA) frameworks. Assessing aspects of the financial, environmental and energy sustainability of supplying co-product second generation biofuel (CPSGB) feedstocks at the farm level requires a framework that permits the trade-offs between these objectives to be quantified and understood. The development of a modelling framework for Managing Energy and Emissions Trade-Offs in Agriculture (MEETA Model) that combines bio-economic process modelling and LCA is presented together with input data parameters obtained from literature and industry sources. The MEETA model quantifies arable farm inputs and outputs in terms of financial, energy and emissions results. The model explicitly captures fertiliser: crop-yield relationships, plus the incorporation of straw or removal for sale, with associated nutrient impacts of incorporation/removal on the following crop in the rotation. Key results of crop-mix, machinery use, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions per kg of crop product and energy use per hectare are in line with previous research and industry survey findings. Results show that the gross margin - energy trade-off is £36 GJ-1, representing the gross margin forgone by maximising net farm energy cf. maximising farm gross margin. The gross margin-GHG emission trade-off is £0.15 kg-1 CO2 eq, representing the gross margin forgone per kg of CO2 eq reduced when GHG emissions are minimised cf. maximising farm gross margin. The energy-GHG emission trade-off is 0.03 GJ kg-1 CO2 eq quantifying the reduction in net energy from the farm system per kg of CO2 eq reduced when minimising GHG emissions cf. maximising net farm energy. When both farm gross margin and net farm energy are maximised all the cereal straw is baled for sale. Sensitivity analysis of the model in relation to different prices of cereal straw shows that it becomes financially optimal to incorporate wheat straw at price of £11 t-1 for this co-product. Local market conditions for straw and farmer attitudes towards incorporation or sale of straw will impact on the straw price at which farmers will supply this potential bioenergy feedstock and represent important areas for future research.

Co-benefits assessment of integrated livestock and cropland system based on emergy, carbon footprint and economic return

Livestock-cropland re-coupling and intensive farming: Strategies for enhancing greenhouse gas mitigation and eco-efficiency in wheat-maize production in north China plain

Mitigation of Nitrogen Losses and Greenhouse Gas Emissions in a More Circular Cropping-Poultry Production System

Cooperation between specialized livestock and crop farms can reduce environmental footprints and increase net profits in livestock production

Optimization of coupling crop and livestock production system's eco-efficiency in northern China based on a life cycle assessment and data envelopment analysis method

An integrated life cycle and water footprint assessment of nonfood crops based bioenergy production

Comparing specialised crop and integrated crop-livestock systems in China with a multi-criteria approach using the emergy method

Cooperation between specialized cropping and livestock farms at local level reduces carbon footprint of agricultural system: A case study of recoupling maize-cow system in South China

Multi-Objective Optimization of Integrated Crop–Livestock Systems: Exploring Resource Allocation Based on Emergy Evaluation

Technological Options to Ameliorate Waste Treatment of Intensive Pig Production in China:An Analysis Based on Bio-Economic Model

An Economic Analysis Software for Evaluating Best Management Practices to Mitigate Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Cropland

Strategies to mitigate the environmental footprints of meat, egg and milk production in northern China

Integrated emergy and economic evaluation of different planting systems in China: implications for coordinating poverty alleviation and rural revitalization

Wheat-Maize Intercropping With Reduced Tillage and Straw Retention: A Step Towards Enhancing Economic and Environmental Benefits in Arid Areas

Coupling of Crop and Livestock Production Can Reduce the Agricultural GHG Emission from Smallholder Farms

Integrated wheat-maize straw and tillage management strategies influence economic profit and carbon footprint in the Guanzhong Plain of China

Mitigating environmental impacts using net energy system in feed formulation in China's pig production

Fruit Tree Legume Herb Intercropping Orchard System Is an Effective Method to Promote the Sustainability of Systems in a Karst Rocky Desertification Control Area

Farm systems assessment of bioenergy feedstock production: Integrating bio-economic models and life cycle analysis approaches

Emergy assessment of a wheat-maize rotation system with different water assignments in the north China plain

Production efficiency and GHG emissions reduction potential evaluation in the crop production system based on emergy synthesis and nonseparable undesirable output DEA: A case study in Zhejiang Province, China