Abstract:Research Summary Previous studies on initial public offerings (IPOs) in mature stock markets have documented that high-reputation underwriters primarily work with high-quality firms and vice versa-that is, they are paired through a quality-matching mechanism. We propose that in a nascent stock market, a pricing mechanism may also play a role, through which pricing (the underwriting fee) sets the pairing. We examine these two mechanisms in the context of China's ChiNext stock exchange, which was launched in 2009 and experienced dramatic regulatory improvements in 2012-2013. With data on IPOs in 2009-2017, we find evidence to support the pricing mechanism's effect before the regulatory improvements and the quality-matching mechanism's effect after the improvements. We contribute to the literature by developing an evolutionary view on the pairing mechanisms between important capital market participants. Managerial Summary In a mature stock market, underwriter reputation signals the underlying quality of initial public offering (IPO) firms to external investors because high-reputation underwriters primarily work with high-quality IPO firms and vice versa. We find that in a nascent stock market before the market experiences regulatory improvements, underwriters and IPO firms are paired through a pricing mechanism. That is, underwriters with higher reputation charge higher underwriting fees, and IPO firms with lower quality pay higher fees. Since the pricing mechanism rather than the quality-matching mechanism sets the pairing, underwriter reputation does not have a signaling effect. Instead, we find that higher underwriting fees signal lower quality of IPO firms. Our findings shed important insights on how market participants are paired in other nascent markets, nascent technology fields and industries.

Brokerage House Initial Public Offerings and Analyst Forecast Quality

IPO Offer Price Regulation, Financial Reporting Quality, and IPO Overpricing

Bayesian piecewise stochastic frontier model to estimate initial public offering pricing efficiency under issuance policy reforms

The Impacts of Underwriting Relationship on Analysts' Earnings Forecasts and Investment Recommendations

Analysts' Strategic Distortion During Ipo Waves

Ambiguous Signals and Information Asymmetry in the Initial Public Offering Process: Examining Ownership Concentration, Process Time, and Underpricing

Torpedo Your Competition: Strategic Reporting and Peer Firm IPO

Stock Market Liberalization, Investment Banks, and Analyst Forecast Quality: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment in China

The JOBS Act and IPO underpricing

How do Investors React to Biased Information? Evidence from Chinese IPO Auctions

The effects of risk factor disclosure on analysts’ earnings forecasts: evidence from Chinese IPOs

The IPO underwriting market share in China: Do ownership and quality matter?

Information quality and IPO underpricing: The role of underwriter pricing and allocation powers

Pre-IPO Analyst Coverage: Hype or Information Production?

IPO Underpricing and Limited Attention: Theory and Evidence

The Long-Run Role of the Media: Evidence from Initial Public Offerings

Earnings forecast errors in IPO prospectuses and their associations with initial stock returns

Analyst Coverage in the Premarket of IPOs

Who Do You Take to Tango? Examining Pairing Mechanisms Between Underwriters and Initial Public Offering Firms in a Nascent Stock Market

Limited Attention, Legalized Bribery and the Initial Public Offering Process

Competitive Effects of IPOs: Evidence from Chinese Listing Suspensions