Timing of Okhotsk Sea Plate Collision with Eurasia Plate: Zircon U‐Pb age constraints from the Sakhalin Island, Russian Far East

Pan Zhao,Igor Alexandrov,Bor‐ming Jahn,Vitaly Ivin,Bor‐ming Jahn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB015800
2019-10-03
Abstract:Abstract The Late Mesozoic to Cenozoic evolution of Northeast Asia involves successive subduction of the Pacific oceanic crust and amalgamation of the Eurasia, North American and Okhotsk Sea Plates. The timing of plate collision is essential for understanding tectonic evolution of NE Asia. In this study, we focus on Okhotsk Sea Plate collision with Eurasia Plate along Sakhalin Island, Russian Far East, which is a highly controversial problem, especially about the timing of collision. In order to determine exact timing for this collision, we report zircon U‐Pb data from both the East Sakhalin accretionary complex and post‐collisional granitic plutons in the Sakhalin Island. Detrital zircon data from four metasedimentary rocks show that the Sikhote‐Alin orogenic belt is the main provenance for the East Sakhalin accretionary complex. Meanwhile, the youngest detrital zircon age constrains the maximum depositional age of East Sakhalin accretionary complex later than 49 Ma. Both Langeri and Val’za plutons are made of peraluminous S‐type granite. Four granitic samples yielded consistent ages at 36‐38 Ma, indicating both plutons were emplaced at Middle Eocene. Their generation is considered to have been derived through crustal anatexis of accretionary wedge in lower crust shortly after tectonic thickening caused by Okhotsk Sea Plate collided with Eurasia Plate. Consequently, our age data constrain that the Okhotsk Sea Plate and Eurasia Plate collision occurred in the Middle Eocene between 49 and 38 Ma. This age range is consistent with Late Eocene uncomformity identified in the Sakhalin Island and Okhotsk Sea.
geochemistry & geophysics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?