Striking a balance when operating for acute type A aortic dissection
Viswajit Kandula,Adham Elmously,Thomas F. X. O'Donnell,Virendra I. Patel,Hiroo Takayama
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/jtd-23-1945
2024-06-02
Journal of Thoracic Disease
Abstract:Viswajit Kandula 1 , Adham Elmously 2 , Thomas F. X. O'Donnell 1 , Virendra I. Patel 1 , Hiroo Takayama 1 1 Division of Cardiac, Thoracic, and Vascular Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY, USA; 2 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA Comment on: Liu H, Zhang YY, Ding XH, et al . Proximal vs Extensive Repair in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery. Ann Thorac Surg 2023;116:270-8. Keywords: Type A dissection; proximal repair; extensive repair Submitted Dec 31, 2023. Accepted for publication Apr 24, 2024. Published online May 27, 2024. doi: 10.21037/jtd-23-1945 Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) continues to be associated with high morbidity and mortality (1,2). These patients, if they don't die before arriving at a hospital, often suffer from concomitant life-threatening pathology such as malperfusion syndromes (including stroke, acute myocardial infarction, renal/visceral ischemia and limb ischemia), aortic regurgitation, or cardiac tamponade. Though surgical intervention, the gold standard treatment, has reduced mortality compared to non-operative management (3,4), the optimal type and extent of repair continue to be debated and remain dependent on the surgeon and surgical center a patient is brought to. Depending on the extent of the dissection, the location of the entry tear, and the patency of the false lumen, patients who undergo repair of a type A dissection are at risk for aneurysmal degeneration over time, which could lead to the development of a thoracoabdominal aneurysm—a factor that should be considered when determining the extent of the repair at the time of the initial operation. These sequelae may require subsequent intervention such as an endovascular stent placement, or in more complicated situations, an open repair of the aneurysm. More recently, total arch replacements with or without concomitant elephant trunks (conventional and frozen) have been implemented to promote false lumen thrombosis and to reduce the risk of distal aneurysm formation. The article titled "Proximal vs Extensive Repair in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery" by Liu et al. analyzed 5,510 patients who presented with ATAAD from 13 hospitals over a 5-year period to create a risk scoring model to help direct the type of repair that should be performed (5). Before delving into this article, it is important to note the excellent results of this series in context. There is a large disparity in the literature regarding surgical outcomes of repair for ATAAD as well as controversies regarding the optimal extent of repair—one that optimizes operative mortality and minimizes re-operative intervention—to achieve the ideal result. Whether one supports a more conservative surgical approach or an aggressive technique such as total arch reconstruction, few series are able to report mortality rates such as these, consistently below 10% (6-8). The authors' propensity score matched patients and implemented the eXtreme Gradient Boosting machine learning library to create a risk prediction model to predict operative mortality in patients. Their alphabet risk model includes parameters of age, body mass index, platelet-to-leukocyte ratio, albumin, hemoglobin, serum creatinine, and preoperative malperfusion to predict operative mortality. Their key finding is that beyond a certain risk probability threshold (4.5%), extensive repair is associated with higher mortality than proximal repair [odds ratio (OR), 2.164; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.679–2.788], indicating that although a certain subset of patients may benefit from more extensive repair, a tailored strategy for repair of ATAAD leads to more favorable outcomes. Similar to this study, our group previously studied the association between the extent of aortic replacement and the outcomes of the procedures (9). We found that distal extension of an aortic procedure is independently associated with a higher complication rate, whereas proximal extension is not. Our multivariate logistic regression further supported this finding by demonstrating that partial or total arch replacement was an independent risk factor for post-operative complications. Like the study published by Liu et al. , our work also suggests that the immediate post-operative risk associated with aortic replacement should be balanced against the suspected future risk of an aortic event. Like the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) risk calculator, which serves as a tool to aid in the prediction of a patient's overall risk of mortality and morbidity when undergoing coronary and/or valve surgery, the model proposed by Liu et al. may provide the initial groundwork for -Abstract Truncated-
respiratory system