Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism Risk Stratification in Patients with Uterine Cancer.

Vincent M. Wagner,Rachael N. Piver,Monica D. Levine,Floor J. Backes,Laura J. Chambers,David E. Cohn,Larry J. Copeland,Casey M. Cosgrove,Christa I. Nagel,David M. O’Malley,Kristin L. Bixel
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2022.12.310
IF: 9.8
2022-12-26
American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Abstract:Background Uterine cancers are associated with a high risk of venous thromboembolism. The American Society of Clinical Oncology practice guidelines recommend all patients undergoing pelvic surgery for cancer receive extended pharmacological thromboprophylaxis with the duration dependent on risk. However, risk stratification for patients with uterine cancer is not clearly defined. The Caprini score is the most widely used risk assessment model but it has been found to have limited utility in the gynecologic oncology population. A modified Caprini score has been explored in other populations. The Khorana score is an additional risk assessment model which has not been studied in this context. Objective Our objective was to evaluate the ability of a modified Caprini model as well as the Khorana score to risk stratify patients with uterine cancer for postoperative venous thromboembolism within 90 days of surgery. Study Design Following IRB approval, a retrospective cohort study was performed and all patients with uterine cancer who underwent a hysterectomy over a 4-year period were included. The Caprini and Khorana scores were calculated for each patient. The Caprini score cutoff for highest risk was evaluated at ≥7, ≥8 and ≥9 ("modified Caprini") and the Khorana score cutoff was evaluated at ≥2 and ≥3. To determine the prognostic utility of each score as well as other clinico-pathologic criteria on development of venous thromboembolism, univariate analysis was performed using independent t test, chi-square test or Fisher's exact test; multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression. Results A total of 954 patients were included, the rate of venous thromboembolism was 1.7% (16/954). Minimally invasive surgical approach was utilized in 90.5% (863/954) of patients. The mean Caprini score of patients with venous thromboembolism was 10.3 compared to 8.1 for the patients without (p<0.0001, 95%CI 1.17-3.33). The mean Khorana score of the venous thromboembolism group was 2.4 versus 1.9 (p=0.03, 95%CI 0.04-0.82). Both the Caprini and Khorana scores were found to be associated with venous thromboembolism, but only a Caprini score with cutoff ≥8 or ≥9 was statistically significant (RR 31.25, 95%CI 1.88-519.49; RR 4.59, 95%CI 1.49-14.13 respectively), with high accuracy based on area under the curve (0.75 and 0.68, respectively). Of the minimally invasive subgroup, 11.7% (101/863) had same-day discharge with no postoperative thromboprophylaxis; none of these patients developed venous thromboembolism. Despite laparotomy patients receiving extended prophylaxis (30 days), the rate of venous thromboembolism was more than three times that of the minimally invasive group (5.49% vs 1.7%). Advanced stage and leukocytosis were noted to be independent risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Conclusions Our study suggests that using a modified Caprini score could help identify the highest risk patients who would benefit from prolonged thromboprophylaxis, reduce the incidence of postoperative venous thromboembolism as well as minimize the cost and harm of overtreatment. These findings need to be validated in a prospective manner and further research is needed to determine the optimal duration of therapy.
obstetrics & gynecology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?