Abstract:Research Summary Despite significant national reductions in crime during the past three decades, a comparable reduction in adult arrest rates has not occurred. In addition, scant attention has been paid to the role of the police in pretrial justice and other criminal justice reform efforts, despite their role as gatekeepers to the criminal justice system. A key inquiry that must be addressed by both academics and practitioners is whether it is possible to reduce crime and the number of arrests simultaneously. Cincinnati (Hamilton County), Ohio, provided a unique opportunity to examine this unanswered question when it closed the Queensgate Correctional Facility in 2008, thereby reducing the available jail space in the county by 36%. By relying on an interrupted time‐series analysis, our findings show that contrary to public concern, both crime and arrests were reduced in Cincinnati even after the jail closure. Specifically, the Cincinnati Police Department reported a statistically significant decrease in felony arrests, and a nonsignificant decline in misdemeanor arrests, while maintaining a continued (nonsignificant) decline in violence and property crimes. Importantly, our findings demonstrate that the previous existent downward trend in Cincinnati reported crimes was not interrupted with the loss of more than one third of the available jail space in Hamilton County. Policy Implications Policy makers and practitioners are concerned with balancing the individual rights of the accused with public safety; reducing incarceration; and promoting a more efficient, effective, and fair criminal justice system. The Cincinnati Police Department addressed these fundamental concerns by changing how officers viewed the use of arrest: as a limited commodity rather than as a standard response. By using strategies such as problem‐oriented policing, place‐based policing, and focused deterrence, Cincinnati Police were able to narrow their focus on the repeat places, problems, and groups of individuals that were driving crime within the city. The evidence suggests that the police can have a significant impact on pretrial justice and other criminal justice reform efforts through the implementation of evidence‐based policing strategies that seek to reduce crime and reduce the use of arrest simultaneously.

Escaping the Sisyphean Trap: Systemic Criminal Justice System Reform

Criminal Justice Reform and Inequality

Reflections on Criminal Justice Reform: Challenges and Opportunities

Some Thoughts about the Reform of Criminal Justice System

Judges’ Perceptions of Systemic Racism in the Criminal Justice System

Shrinking the footprint of the criminal legal system through policies informed by psychology and neuroscience

Are operations backed by best practices in American problem-solving courts?

COVID, Crime & Criminal Justice: Affirming the Call for System Reform Research

An Overview of the Criminal Justice System as a Dominant Mechanism for Social Rehabilitation

The Impact of Police on Criminal Justice Reform

A Systems-Based Approach to Criminal Thinking and Behavior

Cyber-Systemics, Systemic Governance and Disruption of the Criminal Law

How Endogenous System Bias Can Distort Decision-Making in Criminal Justice Systems

Restructuring Law Enforcement Agencies to Support Prosocial Values: A Behavior-Scientific Model for Addressing Police Brutality

The Complicit Canon of Criminal Law: A Critical Survey of Syllabi, Casebooks, and Supplemental Materials

Policymaker and Practitioner Perspectives and Insights from Birmingham, Alabama: An Interview with Judge Andra D. Sparks, Mankinta Holloway, and Melanie Colston

Democratic Innovation in Criminal Justice

Criminogenic or criminalized? Testing an assumption for expanding criminogenic risk assessment.

Modeling the Underlying Dynamics of the Spread of Crime

The predatory dimensions of criminal justice

Radically Rethinking Social Work in the Criminal (in)Justice System in Australia